Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Smith Academy

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Smith Academy

Organization Information
District:Hatfield (01270000)School type:Middle-High School or K-12
School:Smith Academy (01270505)Grades served:07,08,09,10,11,12
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 94.8CPI = 94.3, Target = 94.8 91.0 96.5 94.3 -2.2 94.8 95.5 7210175On Target
High needsCPI = 89.5, Target = 86.2CPI = 89.5, Target = 86.2CPI = 89.5, Target = 86.2 76.4 93.2 89.5 -3.7 86.2 88.2 7631100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 94.6CPI = 95.4, Target = 94.6 90.7 96.4 95.4 -1.0 94.6 95.4 689275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.3, Target = 86.1CPI = 83.3, Target = 86.1CPI = 83.3, Target = 86.1 76.1 85.9 83.3 -2.6 86.1 88.1 641000Declined
High needsCPI = 70, Target = 72.1CPI = 70, Target = 72.1CPI = 70, Target = 72.1 52.2 76.5 70.0 -6.5 72.1 76.1 57300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.7, Target = 85.8CPI = 82.7, Target = 85.8CPI = 82.7, Target = 85.8 75.7 85.8 82.7 -3.1 85.8 87.9 44910Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.8, Target = 89.4CPI = 84.8, Target = 89.4CPI = 84.8, Target = 89.4 81.9 83.9 84.8 0.9 89.4 91.0 786450Improved Below Target
High needs -------20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.6, Target = 89.6CPI = 86.6, Target = 89.6CPI = 86.6, Target = 89.6 82.2 83.2 86.6 3.4 89.6 91.1 715675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.6 17.81010 0.0 2.01010
High needs 33.3 6.5310 0.0 6.5310
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.3 18.5920 0.0 1.1920
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 29.8 33.010025 7.4 14.01000
High needs 27.3 26.7300 21.2 30.0300
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.9 33.09125 7.2 15.4910
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.7 9.4640 6.5 1.66425
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.5 8.9560 7.3 0.05625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 49.0 34.0 -15.0 51.0No9725Below Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 59.5 38.0 -21.5 51.0No3025Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 51.0 34.5 -16.5 51.0No8825Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 50.0 44.0 -6.0 51.0No9650Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 47.0 37.0 -10.0 51.0No2925Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 52.0 45.0 -7.0 51.0No8750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 97.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.6, Target = 80 96.8 97.6 0.8 80.0 90.041100Above Target
High needs --- 80.0 90.016--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.010--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80 96.3 100.0 3.7 80.0 90.039100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.8, Target = 85 94.4 96.8 2.4 85.0 95.031100Above Target
High needs --- 85.0 95.012--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.08--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85 94.1 96.3 2.2 85.0 95.027100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 2.6 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.395130100Above Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 3.7 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 3.29136100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0, Target = 2.3 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.092118100Above Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students101101100Yes100100100Yes6666100Yes
High needs3131100Yes3030100Yes21---
Econ. Disadvantaged16---15---10---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities21---20---15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino4---4---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White9292100Yes9191100Yes5858100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles