Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Amesbury High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Amesbury High

Organization Information
District:Amesbury (00070000)School type:High School
School:Amesbury High (00070505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.6, Target = 98.3CPI = 95.6, Target = 98.3CPI = 95.6, Target = 98.3 97.0 97.0 95.6 -1.4 98.3 98.5 2314925No Change
High needsCPI = 87.2, Target = 93.9CPI = 87.2, Target = 93.9CPI = 87.2, Target = 93.9 89.5 89.6 87.2 -2.4 93.9 94.8 84725No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------25--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  82.5---- 91.3-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.5, Target = 98.6CPI = 96.5, Target = 98.6CPI = 96.5, Target = 98.6 97.6 97.0 96.5 -0.5 98.6 98.8 1513725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 95.9CPI = 91, Target = 95.9CPI = 91, Target = 95.9 93.0 93.3 91.0 -2.3 95.9 96.5 4214725No Change
High needsCPI = 73.3, Target = 86.6CPI = 73.3, Target = 86.6CPI = 73.3, Target = 86.6 77.0 77.4 73.3 -4.1 86.6 88.5 15450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  60.0---- 80.0-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93, Target = 96.3CPI = 93, Target = 96.3CPI = 93, Target = 96.3 93.6 93.4 93.0 -0.4 96.3 96.8 4313525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.2, Target = 95.1CPI = 91.2, Target = 95.1CPI = 91.2, Target = 95.1 91.6 92.4 91.2 -1.2 95.1 95.8 4314225No Change
High needsCPI = 79.7, Target = 87.5CPI = 79.7, Target = 87.5CPI = 79.7, Target = 87.5 78.6 77.6 79.7 2.1 87.5 89.3 344350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities  65.2---- 82.6-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.2, Target = 95.7CPI = 92.2, Target = 95.7CPI = 92.2, Target = 95.7 92.7 92.2 92.2 0.0 95.7 96.4 3513225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 66.7 47.01490 2.7 3.41490
High needs 26.8 17.0470 9.8 10.6470
Econ. Disadvantaged--25---25-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 67.8 50.41370 2.8 2.91370
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 71.3 62.61470 4.7 7.51470
High needs 36.6 22.2450 17.1 24.4450
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--28---28-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 71.3 65.21350 4.9 5.21350
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 31.0 28.91420 2.1 3.51420
High needs 12.8 7.0430 7.7 11.6430
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--26---26-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.2 30.31320 2.2 3.81320
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 66.0 41.0 -25.0 51.0No13350Below Target
High needsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 47.0 46.5 -0.5 51.0No3850Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 66.0 42.0 -24.0 51.0No12450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 60.0 56.0 -4.0 51.0No13175On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 43.0 50.0 7.0 51.0No3650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 61.0 55.5 -5.5 51.0No12275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 90.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.4, Target = 80 90.5 90.4 -0.1 80.0 90.013675On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 77.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 77.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 77.8, Target = 80 82.5 77.8 -4.7 80.0 90.0450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.022--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 90.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.8, Target = 80 91.9 90.8 -1.1 80.0 90.013075On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.1, Target = 85 91.2 91.1 -0.1 85.0 95.015875On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 84.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.1, Target = 85 77.3 84.1 6.8 85.0 95.06350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.033--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 85 92.7 92.6 -0.1 85.0 95.014975On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1, Target = 1.1 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.4 1.1 0.95261875On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 3.4, Target = 3.4 5.8 2.8 3.4 -0.6 3.4 2.93214675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------69--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesDropout Rate = 2, Target = 4.5 7.7 1.3 2.0 -0.7 4.5 3.95299--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.7, Target = 1.1 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.5 1.1 0.95357075On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students152152100Yes15115099Yes15215199Yes
High needs4949100Yes484798Yes494898Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2626100Yes25---26---
EL and Former EL4---4---4---
Students w/ disabilities2929100Yes2828100Yes2929100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---3---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White138138100Yes13713699Yes138138100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles