Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Louise A Conley

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Louise A Conley

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Whitman-Hanson (07800000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Louise A Conley (07800010)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
71% - Partially meeting targets47

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-34-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total81267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth14-24-
Growth total4822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total6.610.3-5.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 64%-78%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage71%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total8.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 85%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage85%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 44

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.5 503.4 4.9 500.0 2974Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 476.3 484.1 7.8 481.0 504Exceeded Target
High needs 486.3 493.0 6.7 487.9 934Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.1 496.6 3.5 494.5 664Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 471.6 484.5 12.9 473.3 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 499.2 504.5 5.3 500.8 2554Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.0 497.5 -2.5 501.4 2970Declined
Lowest Performing 473.6 477.0 3.4 477.2 503Met Target
High needs 485.8 487.4 1.6 487.5 933Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.0 490.5 -0.5 492.1 661No Change
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 473.7 478.2 4.5 475.8 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.3 498.9 -2.4 502.8 2550Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.1 82.0 9.9 74.5 1104Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 54.5 67.1 12.6 57.3 354Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 63.8 70.8 7.0 66.7 244Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.4 82.7 7.3 77.8 944Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.5 50.0 2143Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.8 50.0 503Met Target
High needs 52.1 50.0 683Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.9 50.0 492Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 59.4 50.0 283Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.9 50.0 1843Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 37.9 50.0 2141Below Target
Lowest Performing 48.5 50.0 502Below Target
High needs 43.8 50.0 682Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.1 50.0 492Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 50.7 50.0 283Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 38.3 50.0 1841Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.2 6.1 1.1 6.1 4923Met Target
Lowest Performing 11.8 14.0 -2.2 8.2 500Declined
High needs 14.7 14.6 0.1 12.3 1512Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.0 16.1 -1.1 11.5 930Declined
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 11.7 17.5 -5.8 8.4 570Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 35--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.1 5.3 0.8 4.8 4193Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 307 306100Yes 1 307 306100Yes 1 114 114100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 101 10099Yes 1 101 10099Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 72 72100Yes 1 72 72100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 7---- 7---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 48 4798Yes 1 48 4798Yes 1 16----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 3---- 3---- 0----
Asian 3---- 3---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 262 261100Yes 1 262 261100Yes 1 96 96100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles