Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nissitissit Middle School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Nissitissit Middle School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
North Middlesex (07350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Nissitissit Middle School (07350310)
GRADES SERVED
05,06,07,08
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
64% - Partially meeting targets75

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-
Mathematics achievement04-34-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total71267.55867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-44-
Growth total6822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total6.410.3-5.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 62%-66%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage64%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total81267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total6.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 65%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage65%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 62

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.1 507.0 1.9 506.6 5163Met Target
Lowest Performing 482.8 484.9 2.1 487.5 862Improved Below Target
High needs 491.1 493.4 2.3 492.7 1854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.0 498.5 3.5 496.4 824Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 487.4 488.6 1.2 489.1 1323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.3 507.3 2.0 506.9 4673Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.6 504.1 -1.5 507.0 5170Declined
Lowest Performing 481.7 485.2 3.5 485.3 863Met Target
High needs 493.0 490.8 -2.2 494.7 1850Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.3 493.5 -1.8 496.4 820Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 490.0 487.1 -2.9 492.1 1320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.8 504.4 -1.4 507.3 4680Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.3 83.2 4.9 80.7 2664Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 58.1 69.4 11.3 60.9 904Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 65.3 75.6 10.3 68.2 454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 52.9 63.3 10.4 56.0 604Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 78.7 83.6 4.9 81.1 2394Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.2 50.0 4983Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.0 50.0 863Met Target
High needs 51.8 50.0 1723Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 54.2 50.0 793Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 50.5 50.0 1193Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.4 50.0 4533Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.8 50.0 4933Met Target
Lowest Performing 61.1 50.0 804Exceeded Target
High needs 49.1 50.0 1662Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 48.5 50.0 772Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 47.3 50.0 1132Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.1 50.0 4483Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.6 7.0 1.6 7.5 5283Met Target
Lowest Performing 8.0 9.3 -1.3 4.4 860Declined
High needs 10.3 8.5 1.8 7.9 1882Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.7 9.4 8.3 14.2 644Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 9.1 7.6 1.5 5.8 1322Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 7.9 6.7 1.2 6.6 4783Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 525 52199Yes 1 525 52299Yes 1 270 26899Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 191 18898Yes 1 191 18898Yes 1 94 9298Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 84 84100Yes 1 84 84100Yes 1 46 46100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 7---- 7---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 136 13398Yes 1 136 13398Yes 1 63 6197Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 19---- 19---- 11----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 8----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 475 47299Yes 1 475 473100Yes 1 242 241100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles