Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nashoba Regional

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Nashoba Regional

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Nashoba (07250000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Nashoba Regional (07250505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Low participation rate: Students w/disabilities
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
60% - Partially meeting targets81

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-14-
Science achievement14-14-
Achievement total81247.561267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total6822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-24-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total4810.02410.0
Weighted total7.410.7-5.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 69%-50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage60%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total31247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total3.110.7-
Percentage of possible points 29%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage29%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 51

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 98.7 -0.4 100.0 2154Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.4 98.5 1.1 98.8 504Exceeded Target
High needs 95.0 94.2 -0.8 96.6 391No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 93.3 96.0 2.7 95.2 253Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.5 99.0 -0.5 100.0 1974Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.3 97.4 0.1 98.8 2173Met Target
Lowest Performing 92.8 92.3 -0.5 94.8 521No Change
High needs 86.3 86.3 0.0 88.5 401No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 82.8 84.3 1.5 85.8 272Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 97.6 -1.7 100.0 2004Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 96.6 -0.5 98.5 2081No Change
Lowest Performing 89.4 89.4 0.0 91.5 521No Change
High needs 85.4 85.1 -0.3 87.7 371No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 81.9 81.7 -0.2 84.2 261No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.0 97.0 -1.0 99.4 1913Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.0 50.0 2014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 41.9 50.0 462Below Target
High needs 48.5 50.0 342Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 12--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 54.6 50.0 233Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.9 50.0 1864Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.6 50.0 2072Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.7 50.0 512Below Target
High needs 40.9 50.0 362Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 44.7 50.0 262Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.3 50.0 1913Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.5 95.3 0.8 95.7 2553Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 81.7 85.5 3.8 84.9 624Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 72.2 80.6 8.4 76.8 364Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.5 96.3 0.8 96.9 2183Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.3 95.2 -2.1 98.3 2723Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 89.3 85.0 -4.3 92.1 600Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 33--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 87.9 77.8 -10.1 91.4 360Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.6 95.9 -3.7 100.0 2463Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.5 0.8 -0.3 1.0 9983Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.0 2.5 -0.5 1.8 1580Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 44--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 1.9 0.8 1.1 1.7 1204Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 22--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino---- 48--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 39--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.4 0.5 -0.1 1.0 8713Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.8 10.8 0.0 9.8 9851No Change
Lowest Performing 11.9 11.5 0.4 6.6 522Improved Below Target
High needs 28.7 31.8 -3.1 26.0 1730Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 45--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 29.0 33.3 -4.3 25.1 1200Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 28--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino---- 36--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 29--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 10.2 9.9 0.3 8.9 8762Improved Below Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.8 83.5 1.7 85.0 5143Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 48.0 38.6 -9.4 56.0 830Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 28--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 31.6 34.4 2.8 39.1 642Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.7 86.7 3.0 86.7 4443Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 220 21799Yes 1 219 219100Yes 1 220 21899Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 42 4095Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1 42 42100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 15---- 14---- 15----
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 28 2693No 1 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 4---- 4---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 6---- 5---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 202 19999Yes 1 202 202100Yes 1 202 20099Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles