Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gateway Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Gateway Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Gateway (06720000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Gateway Regional High (06720505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
25% - Partially meeting targets24

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-04-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement14-24-
Achievement total31247.521267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total4822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04----
Extended engagement rate04----
Annual dropout rate04----
High school completion total01220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total7810.04410.0
Weighted total3.010.7-2.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 28%-21%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage25%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total21247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total01220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total2.310.7-
Percentage of possible points 21%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage21%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 14

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.8 95.5 -0.3 97.3 551No Change
Lowest Performing 95.0 91.7 -3.3 97.1 210Declined
High needs 91.0 89.6 -1.4 93.1 241No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.7 91.3 -0.4 93.3 201No Change
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.5 95.3 -0.2 97.1 531No Change

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 89.6 88.0 -1.6 91.5 541No Change
Lowest Performing 86.3 81.0 -5.3 90.5 210Declined
High needs 79.2 78.3 -0.9 81.4 231No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.0 80.0 -5.0 87.4 200Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.2 87.5 -1.7 91.3 521No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.0 88.8 -1.2 91.8 491No Change
Lowest Performing 80.0 81.0 1.0 84.1 212Improved Below Target
High needs 79.8 75.0 -4.8 82.4 210Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.0 88.3 -2.7 92.8 470Declined

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.4 50.0 492Below Target
Lowest Performing 32.9 50.0 201Below Target
High needs 41.3 50.0 202Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 43.7 50.0 472Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.3 50.0 492Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.3 50.0 201Below Target
High needs 48.7 50.0 202Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.4 50.0 472Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 89.9 88.1 -1.8 91.9 590Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 81.8 74.1 -7.7 85.6 270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 84.0 75.0 -9.0 87.8 240Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.6 89.1 -0.5 92.0 551No Change

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.5 89.9 -7.6 99.5 690Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.9 81.8 -11.1 96.0 330Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.7 84.0 -7.7 94.9 250Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.3 89.6 -7.7 99.3 670Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.9 3.2 -2.3 1.0 2170Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.5 3.8 -1.3 2.3 800Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 3.3 -1.3 1.8 610Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.5 3.4 -2.9 1.0 2040Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 18.8 13.6 5.2 16.9 2144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs 31.9 21.6 10.3 29.3 884Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 30.2 26.4 3.8 26.5 533Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 35--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 18.3 13.6 4.7 16.3 1984Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.7 64.0 6.3 63.8 863Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 45.2 31.0 -14.2 53.2 290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.9 31.8 -9.1 51.2 220Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 56.0 65.0 9.0 62.4 804Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 55 55100Yes 1 55 5498Yes 1 55 55100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 24 24100Yes 1 24 2396Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 8---- 8---- 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino---------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 53 53100Yes 1 53 5298Yes 1 53 53100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles