Massachusetts School and District Profiles

George R Austin Intermediate School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - George R Austin Intermediate School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Freetown-Lakeville (06650000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
George R Austin Intermediate School (06650015)
GRADES SERVED
04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
90% - Meeting targets76

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.03410.0
Weighted total9.010.3-7.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 87%-93%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage90%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total81267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 66%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage66%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 58

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.0 504.9 7.9 498.5 4254Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 474.6 485.9 11.3 479.3 494Exceeded Target
High needs 486.9 492.8 5.9 488.5 1254Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 489.8 496.3 6.5 491.2 814Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 478.9 483.4 4.5 480.6 654Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 497.3 505.1 7.8 498.9 4034Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.0 505.3 3.3 503.4 4244Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 475.4 482.1 6.7 479.0 494Exceeded Target
High needs 489.2 491.2 2.0 490.9 1253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.6 494.4 2.8 492.7 814Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 481.2 480.4 -0.8 483.3 650Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.6 505.6 3.0 504.1 4024Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.4 84.2 2.8 83.8 2203Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 68.4 68.4 0.0 71.2 681No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 71.7 71.8 0.1 74.6 392Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 62.8 58.1 -4.7 65.9 400Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 81.7 84.8 3.1 84.1 2023Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.2 50.0 4003Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.4 50.0 483Met Target
High needs 51.7 50.0 1123Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.9 50.0 723Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 48.8 50.0 552Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.2 50.0 3813Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.0 50.0 4014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 55.5 50.0 483Met Target
High needs 50.5 50.0 1133Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 48.1 50.0 732Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 45.7 50.0 552Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 59.3 50.0 3823Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.1 7.4 -1.3 5.0 4590Declined
Lowest Performing 11.8 8.2 3.6 8.2 493Met Target
High needs 13.6 14.8 -1.2 11.2 1420Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.7 15.5 1.2 13.2 842Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 10.9 19.1 -8.2 7.6 680Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.9 7.4 -1.5 4.6 4340Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 447 445100Yes 1 447 44499Yes 1 228 227100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 136 13599Yes 1 136 13599Yes 1 73 7299Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 90 8999Yes 1 90 8999Yes 1 44 4398Yes 1
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 68 6799Yes 1 68 6799Yes 1 41 4098Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 5---- 5---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 9---- 9---- 6----
Hispanic/Latino 2---- 2---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 6---- 6---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 424 422100Yes 1 424 42199Yes 1 210 209100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles