Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Winthrop High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Winthrop High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Winthrop (03460000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Winthrop High School (03460505)
GRADES SERVED
PK,09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Low participation rate: Students w/disabilities -Economically disadvantaged -High needs
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
52% - Partially meeting targets48

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-04-
Mathematics achievement14-34-
Science achievement34-44-
Achievement total41240.071267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-14-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total8820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04----
Extended engagement rate04----
Annual dropout rate14----
High school completion total11220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total8810.04410.0
Weighted total4.510.0-6.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 45%-58%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total41247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total01220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion34-
Additional indicators total7810.0
Weighted total4.210.7-
Percentage of possible points 39%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage39%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 49

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.0 94.8 -3.2 99.5 1340Declined
Lowest Performing 96.0 88.3 -7.7 98.1 300Declined
High needs 95.0 87.7 -7.3 97.1 550Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.4 90.3 -4.1 96.0 360Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.8 95.0 -2.8 99.4 1150Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.7 90.4 -0.3 92.6 1351No Change
Lowest Performing 63.3 67.7 4.4 67.5 313Met Target
High needs 81.7 80.8 -0.9 83.9 561No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 82.9 85.8 2.9 85.3 373Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.2 92.0 -0.2 94.3 1151No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.5 90.0 1.5 90.3 1283Met Target
Lowest Performing 66.4 71.8 5.4 70.5 314Exceeded Target
High needs 78.2 81.6 3.4 80.8 533Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 82.5 85.7 3.2 84.8 353Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.3 91.2 0.9 92.1 1143Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.6 50.0 1164Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 34.6 50.0 231Below Target
High needs 53.9 50.0 423Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 60.7 50.0 294Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 64.1 50.0 1024Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.9 50.0 1144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 52.3 50.0 233Met Target
High needs 67.8 50.0 404Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 66.3 50.0 284Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 66.3 50.0 1014Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 86.6 82.4 -4.2 88.6 1310Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 77.6 68.3 -9.3 81.4 600Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.2 65.9 -11.3 81.0 440Declined
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.4 83.6 -4.8 90.8 1100Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 90.3 87.2 -3.1 92.3 1490Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.7 77.6 -8.1 88.8 670Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 83.4 77.2 -6.2 86.6 570Declined
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 94.6 89.3 -5.3 96.6 1210Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.8 5631No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.7 3.1 -0.4 2.4 2230Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.9 4.1 -3.2 1.0 1470Declined
EL and Former EL---- 23--
Students w/ disabilities---- 104--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 67--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.5 1.5 0.0 1.4 4571No Change

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.9 50.0 7.1 38.8 203Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 20--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 24.4 16.4 8.0 22.5 6084Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 28.1 19.4 8.7 22.6 314Exceeded Target
High needs 35.1 25.4 9.7 32.5 2604Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.0 26.0 12.0 34.3 1544Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 56--
Students w/ disabilities---- 114--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 84--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 21.0 14.0 7.0 19.0 4864Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.1 79.9 7.8 78.2 2794Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 50.5 59.3 8.8 58.5 1133Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.6 58.7 11.1 57.9 753Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 20--
Students w/ disabilities---- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 40--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 77.9 83.4 5.5 84.3 2113Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 140 13596Yes 1 139 13698Yes 1 139 13799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 60 5594No 2 59 5695Yes 1 60 5998Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 39 3694No 2 39 3795Yes 1 39 3897Yes 1
EL and Former EL 11---- 11---- 11----
Students w/ disabilities 28 2490No 2 27 2596Yes 2 28 2796Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 13---- 13---- 13----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 118 11597Yes 1 117 11598Yes 1 118 11799Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles