Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Claypit Hill School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Claypit Hill School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Wayland (03150000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Claypit Hill School (03150005)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
90% - Meeting targets89

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total9.210.3-6.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 89%-91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage90%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total81267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total6.910.3-
Percentage of possible points 67%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage67%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 67

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.3 510.2 3.9 508.0 2734Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 485.8 491.1 5.3 489.7 474Exceeded Target
High needs 491.7 496.9 5.2 493.3 814Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.2 494.5 2.3 493.8 204Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 489.9 495.1 5.2 491.2 654Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 513.6 513.7 0.1 515.5 304Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 506.3 511.1 4.8 507.9 1944Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 509.7 511.0 1.3 510.9 2734Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 485.1 489.2 4.1 487.9 474Exceeded Target
High needs 493.5 496.9 3.4 494.9 814Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.7 491.8 3.1 489.7 204Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 492.6 494.9 2.3 494.4 653Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 521.6 520.9 -0.7 524.0 304Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 509.3 510.9 1.6 510.6 1944Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.6 86.0 -0.6 88.8 1053Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 70.5 61.7 -8.8 73.7 300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 70.0 58.3 -11.7 72.9 210Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 86.9 87.3 0.4 89.0 773Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.7 50.0 1963Met Target
Lowest Performing 48.8 50.0 472Below Target
High needs 44.0 50.0 592Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 42.6 50.0 472Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 55.5 50.0 203Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 14--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 53.6 50.0 1363Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.1 50.0 1963Met Target
Lowest Performing 56.0 50.0 473Met Target
High needs 53.2 50.0 593Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 52.3 50.0 473Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 56.7 50.0 203Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 14--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 60.8 50.0 1364Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.2 0.9 1.3 1.2 4554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 2.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 474Exceeded Target
High needs 3.4 0.8 2.6 1.4 1254Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 244Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 23--
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 1.1 2.1 0.5 904Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 1.8 1.9 -0.1 0.0 524Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 27--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 2.8 0.9 1.9 1.7 3254Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 275 275100Yes 1 275 275100Yes 1 105 105100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 83 83100Yes 1 83 83100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 12----
EL and Former EL 8---- 8---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 65 65100Yes 1 65 65100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 12----
Afr. Amer./Black 19---- 19---- 7----
Hispanic/Latino 13---- 13---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 17---- 17---- 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 194 194100Yes 1 194 194100Yes 1 77 77100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles