Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Uxbridge High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Uxbridge High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Uxbridge (03040000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Uxbridge High (03040505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
84% - Meeting targets47

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement44-44-
Achievement total111247.5121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth44-24-
Growth total6822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total0810.00410.0
Weighted total8.810.7-8.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 82%-85%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total71220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total8.610.7-
Percentage of possible points 80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage80%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 43

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.5 97.5 1.0 98.0 1014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 88.8 93.5 4.7 90.9 274Exceeded Target
High needs 87.9 91.9 4.0 90.0 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.4 97.5 1.1 98.0 894Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.2 92.6 1.4 93.1 1013Met Target
Lowest Performing 71.6 78.7 7.1 75.8 274Exceeded Target
High needs 71.6 80.6 9.0 73.8 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.7 92.4 -0.3 94.8 891No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.5 94.9 4.4 92.3 984Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 74.1 86.1 12.0 78.2 274Exceeded Target
High needs 75.0 88.4 13.4 77.6 284Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.3 94.8 3.5 93.1 874Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.0 50.0 872Below Target
Lowest Performing 36.1 50.0 221Below Target
High needs 41.2 50.0 272Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 20--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.7 50.0 772Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.8 50.0 894Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 49.0 50.0 222Below Target
High needs 58.0 50.0 273Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 20--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 2--
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 64.5 50.0 794Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 89.0 91.3 2.3 91.0 1273Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 77.6 80.9 3.3 81.4 473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 29--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 0--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.6 91.5 1.9 92.0 1173Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 84.8 89.0 4.2 86.8 1364Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 84.8 77.6 -7.2 87.9 490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 39--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.5 89.6 1.1 90.5 1252Improved Below Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 3.8 1.0 2.8 3.4 4784Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 9.0 2.4 6.6 8.1 1264Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 80--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 68--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 2.7 0.9 1.8 2.4 4394Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.3 16.0 -1.7 12.4 4860Declined
Lowest Performing 17.2 29.6 -12.4 11.7 270Declined
High needs 26.4 32.9 -6.5 23.8 1490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 87--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities---- 71--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 13.6 16.0 -2.4 11.6 4450Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.0 54.0 -5.0 65.1 2350Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 26.6 38.6 12.0 34.6 574Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 36--
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 59.2 54.6 -4.6 65.6 2160Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 104 104100Yes 1 105 105100Yes 1 105 105100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 14---- 14---- 14----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 3---- 3---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 0---- 0---- 0----
White 92 92100Yes 1 93 93100Yes 1 93 93100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles