Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Helen Hansen Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Helen Hansen Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Stoughton (02850000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Helen Hansen Elementary (02850010)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
47% - Partially meeting targets26

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement34-04-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total61267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth14-14-
Growth total3822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.00410.0
Weighted total4.910.3-3.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 48%-45%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage47%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth04-
Growth total2822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total1410.0
Weighted total6.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 79%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 37

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.9 501.1 1.2 501.4 1123Met Target
Lowest Performing 475.9 483.0 7.1 481.4 204Exceeded Target
High needs 493.5 496.4 2.9 495.3 534Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.8 497.6 0.8 498.1 343Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 482.4 489.3 6.9 484.2 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black 490.7 494.3 3.6 492.3 214Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 502.3 501.7 -0.6 504.0 670Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.4 498.4 1.0 498.9 1123Met Target
Lowest Performing 476.8 475.3 -1.5 479.8 200Declined
High needs 488.5 493.8 5.3 490.1 534Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.4 494.6 7.2 488.4 344Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 477.9 486.3 8.4 479.7 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black 486.4 494.4 8.0 488.7 214Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 501.2 499.0 -2.2 502.9 670Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 67.9 58.7 -9.2 70.6 460Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 22--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 77.8 63.6 -14.2 80.6 330Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.3 50.0 762Below Target
Lowest Performing 47.8 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 49.3 50.0 342Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.9 50.0 212Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 48.1 50.0 492Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 33.7 50.0 761Below Target
Lowest Performing 37.3 50.0 201Below Target
High needs 29.0 50.0 340Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.8 50.0 210Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 33.4 50.0 491Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.0 8.5 0.5 7.7 2002Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 4.8 15.0 -10.2 0.9 200Declined
High needs 14.7 14.9 -0.2 12.4 1011No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.5 20.0 -5.5 11.4 500Declined
EL and Former EL---- 27--
Students w/ disabilities 18.4 15.4 3.0 14.6 392Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 10.5 11.4 -0.9 6.8 350Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 6.8 6.9 -0.1 5.1 1161No Change

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 115 11499Yes 1 115 115100Yes 1 46 46100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 56 5598Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 37 3697Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1 14----
EL and Former EL 14---- 14---- 7----
Students w/ disabilities 25 2496Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 1---- 1---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 7----
Hispanic/Latino 15---- 15---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 8---- 8---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 67 6699Yes 1 67 67100Yes 1 33 33100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles