Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Thomas M Balliet

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Thomas M Balliet

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Springfield (02810000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Thomas M Balliet (02810015)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Among the lowest performing 10% of schools
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
41% - Partially meeting targets8

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total41267.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth14-14-
Growth total3822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total3.710.3-3.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 36%-45%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage41%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total81267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total6.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 61%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 15

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 487.3 493.0 5.7 489.3 1334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 467.8 474.9 7.1 473.1 214Exceeded Target
High needs 484.8 491.5 6.7 486.8 1074Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 484.9 491.2 6.3 486.5 1014Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 476.1 483.5 7.4 477.9 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 487.8 488.7 0.9 489.4 362Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 486.1 491.6 5.5 487.8 764Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 16--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 489.3 485.1 -4.2 491.1 1320Declined
Lowest Performing 466.8 465.7 -1.1 470.1 210Declined
High needs 485.5 483.3 -2.2 487.4 1060Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 485.9 483.2 -2.7 487.3 1000Declined
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 479.0 475.9 -3.1 481.1 260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 488.3 480.1 -8.2 490.1 360Declined
Hispanic/Latino 488.5 483.9 -4.6 490.1 750Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 16--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.6 52.6 -3.0 58.5 490Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 45.8 51.3 5.5 48.9 404Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 38--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino 51.1 48.8 -2.3 54.2 211No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 8--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.7 50.0 872Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.2 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 49.5 50.0 682Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.8 50.0 642Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black 50.8 50.0 253Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 46.8 50.0 492Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 10--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 32.0 50.0 871Below Target
Lowest Performing 30.2 50.0 211Below Target
High needs 32.4 50.0 681Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 32.0 50.0 641Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black 30.2 50.0 251Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 30.1 50.0 491Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 10--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 13.7 12.3 1.4 11.8 2363Met Target
Lowest Performing 19.0 23.8 -4.8 14.3 210Declined
High needs 15.4 13.7 1.7 13.1 1902Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.7 15.3 -0.6 12.3 1630Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 20.6 17.1 3.5 16.3 412Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 8.9 13.1 -4.2 5.0 610Declined
Hispanic/Latino 16.4 14.2 2.2 13.0 1412Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 25--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 146 14599Yes 1 146 14499Yes 1 53 5298Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 119 11899Yes 1 119 11798Yes 1 44 4398Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 113 11299Yes 1 113 11198Yes 1 42 4198Yes 1
EL and Former EL 12---- 12---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 18----
Hispanic/Latino 86 86100Yes 1 86 8599Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 18---- 18---- 10----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles