Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Rockland Senior High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Rockland Senior High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Rockland (02510000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Rockland Senior High (02510505)
GRADES SERVED
PK,09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
33% - Partially meeting targets33

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-14-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement24-24-
Achievement total41247.531267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-14-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total5822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate14----
Annual dropout rate04----
High school completion total41220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total6810.00410.0
Weighted total4.410.7-2.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 41%-24%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage33%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total71247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total8810.0
Weighted total5.810.7-
Percentage of possible points 54%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 42

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 97.3 -0.5 99.3 1571No Change
Lowest Performing 93.5 91.0 -2.5 95.6 361No Change
High needs 93.9 95.0 1.1 96.0 553Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.9 95.6 -0.3 97.5 401No Change
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.3 97.8 -0.5 99.9 1274Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 89.1 88.0 -1.1 91.0 1561No Change
Lowest Performing 61.3 57.4 -3.9 65.5 370Declined
High needs 78.7 79.6 0.9 80.9 542Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 81.8 83.8 2.0 84.2 403Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.3 88.5 -2.8 93.4 1260Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 89.2 89.4 0.2 91.0 1532Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 71.0 73.0 2.0 75.1 372Improved Below Target
High needs 82.1 82.2 0.1 84.7 522Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.0 87.5 2.5 87.3 383Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.9 90.6 -0.3 92.7 1251No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.8 50.0 1453Met Target
Lowest Performing 37.5 50.0 321Below Target
High needs 51.9 50.0 473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.7 50.0 363Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.3 50.0 1173Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.3 50.0 1442Below Target
Lowest Performing 31.2 50.0 321Below Target
High needs 39.6 50.0 461Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.2 50.0 351Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 41.7 50.0 1162Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 88.7 90.7 2.0 90.7 1503Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.5 81.5 -4.0 89.3 650Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.7 84.5 -3.2 91.5 580Declined
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.1 89.7 1.6 90.5 1262Improved Below Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.3 92.9 -0.4 95.3 1411No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 86.4 92.1 5.7 89.5 764Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.5 92.3 4.8 90.7 654Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.8 92.9 -0.9 95.8 1260Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.5 3.0 -2.5 1.0 6310Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.1 7.6 -6.5 1.0 1700Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.7 5.5 -4.8 1.0 1630Declined
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 31--
Hispanic/Latino---- 54--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 28--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.4 3.1 -2.7 1.0 5160Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 19.4 18.7 0.7 17.5 5942Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 22.6 29.7 -7.1 17.1 370Declined
High needs 31.8 28.6 3.2 29.2 2174Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.4 32.7 4.7 33.7 1564Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 32--
Students w/ disabilities---- 56--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 25--
Hispanic/Latino---- 77--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 17.7 16.7 1.0 15.7 4682Improved Below Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.4 97.3 39.9 63.5 2614Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 26.9 97.0 70.1 34.9 664Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.4 100.0 72.6 37.7 494Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 59.4 97.7 38.3 65.8 2164Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 166 16398Yes 1 165 16399Yes 1 167 167100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 63 6095Yes 1 61 5997Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 44 4295Yes 1 43 4298Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 9----
Students w/ disabilities 17---- 16---- 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 25 25100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 129 12899Yes 1 128 128100Yes 1 130 130100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles