Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Kittredge

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Kittredge

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
North Andover (02110000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Kittredge (02110015)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
88% - Meeting targets88

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total91267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total7822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total8.010.3-7.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 78%-97%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage88%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth---
Mathematics growth---
Growth total---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total6.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 88%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage88%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 507.8 510.2 2.4 509.5 1474Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 487.7 495.7 8.0 491.6 254Exceeded Target
High needs 498.0 499.5 1.5 499.6 413Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 493.7 497.3 3.6 495.0 294Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 507.8 510.2 2.4 509.4 1134Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 512.0 517.9 5.9 513.2 1474Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 491.2 498.0 6.8 494.0 254Exceeded Target
High needs 496.8 510.8 14.0 498.2 414Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 491.2 505.8 14.6 493.0 294Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 512.0 518.5 6.5 513.3 1134Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.5 85.5 0.0 87.7 501No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 8--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 4--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.5 86.6 -0.9 89.6 413Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.6 50.0 953Met Target
Lowest Performing 52.4 50.0 253Met Target
High needs-- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.2 50.0 743Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.8 50.0 934Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 69.0 50.0 234Exceeded Target
High needs-- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 8--
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.9 50.0 724Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.8 5.6 1.2 5.8 2483Met Target
Lowest Performing 12.0 4.0 8.0 8.8 254Exceeded Target
High needs 15.4 8.1 7.3 13.4 624Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 14.3 9.5 4.8 11.6 424Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 6.0 5.7 0.3 4.9 1942Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 152 15199Yes 1 152 15199Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 42 42100Yes 1 42 42100Yes 1 9----
Econ. Disadvantaged 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 5----
EL and Former EL 6---- 6---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 30 30100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 6---- 6---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 116 11599Yes 1 116 11599Yes 1 42 42100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles