Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Brayton

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Brayton

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
North Adams (02090000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Brayton (02090035)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
73% - Partially meeting targets26

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total71267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-34-
Growth total4822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.04410.0
Weighted total5.610.3-6.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 54%-91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage73%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total3.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 47%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage47%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 54

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 493.7 498.2 4.5 495.7 1354Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 477.3 483.7 6.4 482.6 244Exceeded Target
High needs 490.6 495.5 4.9 492.6 1074Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.4 495.0 3.6 493.0 1014Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 489.5 494.3 4.8 491.3 354Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 494.1 499.1 5.0 496.2 1104Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.8 491.8 -1.0 494.6 1350Declined
Lowest Performing 478.0 483.4 5.4 481.3 244Exceeded Target
High needs 490.6 489.4 -1.2 492.5 1070Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.6 489.3 -1.3 492.0 1010Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 491.5 490.1 -1.4 493.6 350Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 493.0 492.2 -0.8 495.3 1100Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 71.0 75.0 4.0 73.9 393Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 32--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 30--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 72.7 76.6 3.9 75.9 323Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.4 50.0 992Below Target
Lowest Performing 47.7 50.0 242Below Target
High needs 46.6 50.0 782Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.3 50.0 762Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 40.3 50.0 222Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.9 50.0 782Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 43.1 50.0 992Below Target
Lowest Performing 50.3 50.0 243Met Target
High needs 41.2 50.0 782Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.5 50.0 762Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 46.8 50.0 222Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.4 50.0 782Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.8 8.5 -1.7 4.9 2010Declined
Lowest Performing 4.2 0.0 4.2 0.0 244Exceeded Target
High needs 7.9 9.1 -1.2 5.6 1540Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.0 9.4 -1.4 5.6 1380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 0--
Students w/ disabilities 15.5 14.9 0.6 11.2 472Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.8 8.3 -2.5 3.2 1680Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 146 146100Yes 1 146 146100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 117 117100Yes 1 117 117100Yes 1 34 34100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 109 109100Yes 1 109 109100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 40 40100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 118 118100Yes 1 118 118100Yes 1 33 33100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles