Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Greylock

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Greylock

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
North Adams (02090000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Greylock (02090015)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
58% - Partially meeting targets39

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-24-
Mathematics achievement24-04-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total101267.52867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total8.210.3-2.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 80%-36%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage58%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total8.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 79%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 61

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.1 501.0 8.9 494.1 1394Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 476.3 478.7 2.4 481.6 262Improved Below Target
High needs 488.2 497.3 9.1 490.2 864Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.6 497.4 9.8 489.2 754Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 484.9 482.9 -2.0 486.7 290Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 492.6 501.3 8.7 494.7 1114Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.6 495.6 1.0 496.4 1392Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 478.6 477.0 -1.6 481.9 260Declined
High needs 491.7 491.8 0.1 493.6 862Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.3 491.3 1.0 491.7 753Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 491.4 483.3 -8.1 493.5 290Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 494.6 496.4 1.8 496.9 1113Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 67.0 76.3 9.3 69.9 384Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 62.9 70.2 7.3 66.0 214Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 66.9 74.1 7.2 70.1 284Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.4 50.0 1103Met Target
Lowest Performing 41.0 50.0 262Below Target
High needs 53.0 50.0 663Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 54.1 50.0 573Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 37.1 50.0 211Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 51.7 50.0 893Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.5 50.0 1112Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.9 50.0 262Below Target
High needs 41.6 50.0 672Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.9 50.0 582Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 33.0 50.0 221Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 46.1 50.0 892Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.7 10.3 1.4 9.8 2233Met Target
Lowest Performing 14.8 7.7 7.1 10.1 264Exceeded Target
High needs 16.2 14.7 1.5 13.9 1502Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.1 15.0 4.1 16.7 1274Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 12.2 15.4 -3.2 7.9 390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 10.2 8.9 1.3 7.6 1792Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 143 143100Yes 1 143 143100Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 89 89100Yes 1 89 89100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 78 78100Yes 1 78 78100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 8----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 11---- 11---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 1----
White 113 113100Yes 1 113 113100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles