Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Johnson

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Johnson

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Natick (01980000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Johnson (01980031)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
68% - Partially meeting targets76

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement------
Achievement total2867.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total3.17.6-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 41%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage68%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total0890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth---
Mathematics growth---
Growth total---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total0.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 0%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage0%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.4 506.2 0.8 507.1 852Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 483.8 491.2 7.4 487.7 204Exceeded Target
High needs 491.3 487.4 -3.9 492.9 250Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.4 507.9 2.5 507.0 704Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.0 503.7 -1.3 506.2 850Declined
Lowest Performing 477.7 483.1 5.4 480.5 204Exceeded Target
High needs 484.3 475.3 -9.0 485.7 250Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.2 505.5 0.3 506.5 702Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.8 50.0 463Met Target
Lowest Performing 53.8 50.0 203Met Target
High needs-- 12--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 7--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 61.4 50.0 354Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.9 50.0 463Met Target
Lowest Performing 57.4 50.0 203Met Target
High needs-- 12--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 7--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.7 50.0 353Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 1.6 1.7 -0.1 0.6 1804Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 5.0 0.0 5.0 1.8 204Exceeded Target
High needs 4.3 7.3 -3.0 2.3 410Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 23--
EL and Former EL---- 0--
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.1 1.4 0.7 1.0 1464Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 85 85100Yes 1 86 86100Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 25 25100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 14---- 14---- 0----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 16---- 17---- 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 5---- 5---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 3---- 3---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 70 70100Yes 1 71 71100Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles