Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Roosevelt

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Roosevelt

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Melrose (01780000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Roosevelt (01780035)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
68% - Partially meeting targets74

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total71260.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth24-34-
Growth total5820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.03410.0
Weighted total5.99.6-5.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 61%-75%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage68%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total41267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total3.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 37%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage37%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 72

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.3 508.9 2.6 508.0 1914Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 485.7 495.6 9.9 489.6 304Exceeded Target
High needs 495.2 497.8 2.6 496.8 564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.8 497.4 0.6 498.4 272Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 489.3 493.9 4.6 490.6 344Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 507.5 510.5 3.0 509.1 1534Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 509.2 506.8 -2.4 510.4 1910Declined
Lowest Performing 484.9 486.6 1.7 487.7 302Improved Below Target
High needs 500.6 496.5 -4.1 502.0 560Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.4 493.3 -6.1 500.4 270Declined
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 492.6 492.2 -0.4 494.4 341No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 510.1 508.7 -1.4 511.4 1533Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 87.1 86.9 -0.2 89.3 673Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 80.0 71.3 -8.7 83.2 200Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.6 88.2 -1.4 91.7 573Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.2 50.0 1233Met Target
Lowest Performing 59.0 50.0 303Met Target
High needs 45.4 50.0 352Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 45.3 50.0 222Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.6 50.0 1033Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.5 50.0 1222Below Target
Lowest Performing 50.5 50.0 293Met Target
High needs 43.8 50.0 352Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 47.6 50.0 222Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 0--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 43.6 50.0 1032Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 81.0 -14.2 78.2 213Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.7 5.0 1.7 5.7 3794Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 3.2 3.3 -0.1 0.0 303Met Target
High needs 10.3 8.9 1.4 8.3 1232Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.8 10.2 8.6 14.6 594Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 40--
Students w/ disabilities 5.8 3.5 2.3 3.1 573Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 26--
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.2 3.1 3.1 5.1 2904Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 197 19699Yes 1 197 19699Yes 1 68 6799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 59 59100Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 29 29100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 10----
EL and Former EL 15---- 16---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 35 35100Yes 1 34 34100Yes 1 15----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 13---- 13---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 7---- 8---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 155 155100Yes 1 155 155100Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles