Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sippican

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Sippican

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Marion (01690000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Sippican (01690005)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
82% - Meeting targets76

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total111267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-
Mathematics growth24-34-
Growth total4822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.00410.0
Weighted total8.710.3-6.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 84%-80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage82%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total61267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total5.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage50%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 73

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.3 509.1 3.8 506.8 2464Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 480.9 487.7 6.8 485.6 434Exceeded Target
High needs 494.7 498.4 3.7 496.3 894Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 497.6 501.6 4.0 499.0 524Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 489.0 490.8 1.8 490.7 503Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.8 508.9 3.1 507.4 2174Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 508.7 507.4 -1.3 510.1 2463Met Target
Lowest Performing 482.9 486.4 3.5 486.5 433Met Target
High needs 498.3 494.9 -3.4 500.0 890Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.6 496.2 -3.4 500.7 520Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 492.3 489.1 -3.2 494.4 500Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.3 507.3 -2.0 510.8 2173Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 79.8 85.4 5.6 82.2 724Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 67.3 67.5 0.2 70.1 302Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.1 86.7 6.6 82.5 624Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.6 50.0 1832Below Target
Lowest Performing 51.1 50.0 413Met Target
High needs 49.0 50.0 692Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 48.4 50.0 412Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 46.5 50.0 372Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.6 50.0 1652Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.1 50.0 1842Below Target
Lowest Performing 54.1 50.0 413Met Target
High needs 46.8 50.0 692Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.9 50.0 412Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 51.4 50.0 373Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.9 50.0 1652Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.1 2.7 1.4 3.0 3774Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 4.5 7.0 -2.5 0.9 430Declined
High needs 6.5 5.1 1.4 4.1 1362Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.0 4.1 3.9 4.5 733Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 4.2 2.1 3.0 712Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.6 2.4 1.2 2.3 3274Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 249 248100Yes 1 249 248100Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 91 91100Yes 1 91 91100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 54 54100Yes 1 54 54100Yes 1 18----
EL and Former EL 3---- 3---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 50 50100Yes 1 50 50100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 5---- 5---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 6---- 6---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 218 217100Yes 1 218 217100Yes 1 62 62100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles