Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Blueberry Hill

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Blueberry Hill

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Longmeadow (01590000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Blueberry Hill (01590005)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
88% - Meeting targets93

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-34-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-44-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total7822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.04410.0
Weighted total9.010.3-6.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 87%-88%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage88%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total6.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 83%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage83%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 96

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.9 516.0 5.1 512.6 2324Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 484.9 497.0 12.1 488.8 404Exceeded Target
High needs 495.6 503.0 7.4 497.2 584Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 494.4 500.3 5.9 495.7 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 516.5 519.6 3.1 518.4 384Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 510.6 515.1 4.5 512.2 1744Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 511.7 511.1 -0.6 512.9 2324Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 488.9 492.0 3.1 491.7 403Met Target
High needs 499.7 501.2 1.5 501.1 583Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 495.4 499.5 4.1 497.2 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 523.0 520.8 -2.2 525.4 384Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 509.7 508.7 -1.0 511.0 1743Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.9 86.1 -2.8 91.1 723Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 5--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 89.7 86.6 -3.1 91.8 563Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.6 50.0 1554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 60.2 50.0 404Exceeded Target
High needs 59.0 50.0 413Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 54.6 50.0 303Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 69.7 50.0 304Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 3--
White 62.1 50.0 1114Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.9 50.0 1573Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.1 50.0 403Met Target
High needs 53.8 50.0 423Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 9--
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 51.9 50.0 313Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 63.7 50.0 304Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 3--
White 53.9 50.0 1133Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.5 4.4 -1.9 1.5 3850Declined
Lowest Performing 4.9 0.0 4.9 1.7 404Exceeded Target
High needs 7.1 6.9 0.2 5.1 872Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 5.2 3.5 1.7 2.5 573Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 2.8 4.3 -1.5 0.6 700Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 2.3 4.6 -2.3 1.2 2810Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 234 233100Yes 1 234 233100Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 60 5998Yes 1 60 5998Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 15---- 15---- 6----
EL and Former EL 10---- 10---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 39 3897Yes 1 39 3897Yes 1 11----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 8---- 8---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 8---- 8---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 3---- 3---- 1----
White 174 174100Yes 1 174 174100Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles