Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Littleton High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Littleton High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Littleton (01580000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Littleton High School (01580505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
79% - Meeting targets96

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement44-34-
Science achievement34-44-
Achievement total111247.581267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total7822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total7810.00410.0
Weighted total9.710.7-6.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 91%-66%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total101247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total8.310.7-
Percentage of possible points 78%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage78%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 96

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.8 99.1 -0.7 100.0 1144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 99.2 97.4 -1.8 100.0 291No Change
High needs 99.1 97.8 -1.3 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 100.0 99.3 -0.7 100.0 1034Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.9 99.1 0.2 100.0 1134Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.6 96.6 -1.0 99.6 293Met Target
High needs 95.4 95.7 0.3 97.6 233Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 99.0 99.0 0.0 100.0 1024Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.3 97.4 1.1 97.7 1143Met Target
Lowest Performing 87.9 92.2 4.3 90.0 294Exceeded Target
High needs 88.4 91.0 2.6 90.7 253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 96.9 97.6 0.7 98.3 1034Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.0 50.0 1073Met Target
Lowest Performing 40.6 50.0 272Below Target
High needs 50.4 50.0 213Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 8--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 56.0 50.0 973Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.6 50.0 1074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 69.0 50.0 274Exceeded Target
High needs 68.6 50.0 214Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 8--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 70.1 50.0 974Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 98.3 0.2 99.3 1183Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.7 94.3 -2.4 99.9 350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 0--
Students w/ disabilities---- 30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 0--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 98.9 98.1 -0.8 100.0 1063Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 100.0 1.9 99.1 1074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.0 100.0 8.0 94.8 304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.0 100.0 1.0 100.0 954Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.0 4674Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1054Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 25--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 87--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 23--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.0 4194Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.3 8.5 -0.2 7.3 4683Met Target
Lowest Performing 3.2 24.1 -20.9 0.0 290Declined
High needs 21.0 23.8 -2.8 18.3 1050Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 83--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 26--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 8.1 8.5 -0.4 6.8 4113Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.5 97.8 25.3 75.7 2314Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 32.7 100.0 67.3 40.7 524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 46--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 72.7 97.1 24.4 75.7 2054Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 115 11499Yes 1 115 11499Yes 1 115 115100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 24 2396Yes 1 25 2496Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 8---- 9---- 9----
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 18---- 18---- 18----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 6---- 6---- 6----
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 1---- 1---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 104 10399Yes 1 104 10399Yes 1 104 104100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles