Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lillian M Jacobs

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lillian M Jacobs

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Hull (01420000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Lillian M Jacobs (01420015)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
32% - Partially meeting targets46

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-34-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total31267.53867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth14-04-
Growth total3822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.01410.0
Weighted total3.110.3-2.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 30%-34%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage32%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total61267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth04-
Growth total2822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total4.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 47%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage47%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 48

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.0 503.5 -2.5 507.5 1800Declined
Lowest Performing 478.1 483.3 5.2 482.8 273Met Target
High needs 494.7 495.0 0.3 496.3 782Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.7 496.4 -0.3 498.1 631No Change
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 484.7 487.8 3.1 486.4 364Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.6 503.9 -2.7 508.2 1750Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.8 498.3 -5.5 505.2 1800Declined
Lowest Performing 478.3 470.9 -7.4 481.9 270Declined
High needs 492.4 486.5 -5.9 494.1 780Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.4 488.3 -5.1 494.5 630Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 486.2 479.7 -6.5 488.3 360Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.4 498.8 -5.6 505.9 1750Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 83.5 85.2 1.7 85.9 543Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 70.2 79.8 9.6 73.0 214Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.6 84.9 1.3 86.0 533Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.9 50.0 1172Below Target
Lowest Performing 47.1 50.0 272Below Target
High needs 40.8 50.0 522Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.1 50.0 432Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 41.0 50.0 212Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 43.1 50.0 1142Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 30.5 50.0 1171Below Target
Lowest Performing 25.8 50.0 270Below Target
High needs 25.8 50.0 520Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.8 50.0 430Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 24.7 50.0 210Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 30.8 50.0 1141Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.5 5.2 2.3 6.4 3084Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 10.7 11.1 -0.4 7.1 271No Change
High needs 11.9 9.8 2.1 9.5 1433Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.1 12.8 -0.7 8.6 940Declined
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 8.2 11.1 -2.9 4.9 630Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.8 4.9 1.9 5.5 2864Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 188 18799Yes 1 189 18899Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 84 8399Yes 1 85 8499Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 68 6799Yes 1 69 6899Yes 1 19----
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 38 38100Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino---------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 182 18199Yes 1 183 18299Yes 1 55 55100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles