Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ivan G Smith

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Ivan G Smith

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Danvers (00710000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Ivan G Smith (00710032)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
92% - Meeting targets74

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total121267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-44-
Growth total6822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total9.510.3-7.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-92%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage92%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total4.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 54%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 65

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.7 506.6 2.9 505.2 1444Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 482.7 491.8 9.1 487.4 244Exceeded Target
High needs 492.1 495.6 3.5 493.7 404Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.8 498.1 -1.7 501.2 310Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 476.6 484.8 8.2 478.3 224Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 503.4 507.4 4.0 505.0 1204Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.7 506.3 2.6 505.1 1444Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 481.0 488.0 7.0 484.6 244Exceeded Target
High needs 493.4 492.4 -1.0 495.1 400Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 497.3 492.1 -5.2 498.4 310Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 486.2 482.9 -3.3 488.3 220Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 503.9 508.3 4.4 505.4 1204Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.5 77.1 4.6 74.9 474Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 70.8 76.3 5.5 73.2 404Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.7 50.0 953Met Target
Lowest Performing 51.5 50.0 243Met Target
High needs 52.0 50.0 253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.4 50.0 823Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.1 50.0 953Met Target
Lowest Performing 60.4 50.0 244Exceeded Target
High needs 52.0 50.0 253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 59.7 50.0 823Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.6 5.9 -2.3 2.5 2380Declined
Lowest Performing 0.0 4.2 -4.2 0.0 240Declined
High needs 6.3 14.5 -8.2 3.9 550Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.5 15.8 -6.3 6.0 380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 12.5 -8.9 0.3 240Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 2.4 5.6 -3.2 1.1 1970Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 145 145100Yes 1 145 145100Yes 1 48 48100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 41 41100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1 15----
Econ. Disadvantaged 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 11----
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 5---- 5---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 120 120100Yes 1 120 120100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles