Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Roger Clap

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Roger Clap

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Roger Clap (00350298)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Among the lowest performing 10% of schools
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
64% - Partially meeting targets5

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44----
Mathematics achievement34----
Science achievement------
Achievement total7860.0---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14----
Mathematics growth14----
Growth total2820.0---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total0410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04----
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.0---
Weighted total4.67.2----
Percentage of possible points 64%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage64%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage80%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 14

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 486.1 492.3 6.2 488.1 624Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 480.3 491.8 11.5 482.3 534Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 479.9 493.0 13.1 481.5 394Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 476.1 494.5 18.4 477.7 234Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 26--
Hispanic/Latino 483.0 490.8 7.8 484.7 214Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 12--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 482.5 483.9 1.4 484.3 623Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 478.6 483.5 4.9 480.5 534Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 475.9 481.9 6.0 477.3 394Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 476.3 486.5 10.2 478.1 234Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 26--
Hispanic/Latino 479.5 479.6 0.1 481.1 212Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 12--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students---- 13--
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 12--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 2--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 38.9 50.0 271Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 42.5 50.0 232Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 4--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 37.6 50.0 271Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 38.4 50.0 231Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 4--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.1 50.0 -24.1 70.2 360Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 74.1 50.0 -24.1 70.2 360Declined
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 21.0 22.8 -1.8 19.1 1140Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 23.1 24.0 -0.9 20.8 1000Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 29.0 32.9 -3.9 26.6 730Declined
EL and Former EL 22.2 19.0 3.2 18.5 423Met Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 48--
Hispanic/Latino 34.8 35.1 -0.3 31.4 371No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 23--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 73 73100Yes 1 74 74100Yes 1 17----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 64 64100Yes 1 65 65100Yes 1 16----
Econ. Disadvantaged 48 48100Yes 1 49 49100Yes 1 14----
EL and Former EL 30 30100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 10----
Students w/ disabilities 16---- 16---- 3----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 5----
Hispanic/Latino 28 28100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 12---- 12---- 2----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles