Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Thomas Willett Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Thomas Willett Elementary School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Attleboro (00160000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Thomas Willett Elementary School (00160035)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
84% - Meeting targets63

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement------
Achievement total7860.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total0410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.00410.0
Weighted total5.67.2-6.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 78%-89%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total7.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage92%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 68

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.1 508.3 2.2 507.6 1764Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 483.2 489.7 6.5 487.9 214Exceeded Target
High needs 496.5 499.6 3.1 498.1 924Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 498.6 501.9 3.3 500.0 694Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 501.0 495.5 -5.5 503.0 220Declined
Students w/ disabilities 489.0 488.4 -0.6 490.7 320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.8 511.2 4.4 508.4 1174Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.0 499.4 1.4 499.4 1763Met Target
Lowest Performing 468.7 480.7 12.0 472.3 214Exceeded Target
High needs 487.2 490.1 2.9 488.9 924Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.8 491.3 2.5 489.9 694Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 494.1 488.0 -6.1 496.3 220Declined
Students w/ disabilities 482.6 479.8 -2.8 484.7 320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.8 502.3 3.5 500.3 1174Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.0 50.0 803Met Target
Lowest Performing 51.4 50.0 213Met Target
High needs 52.9 50.0 453Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.7 50.0 323Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.1 50.0 553Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.1 50.0 793Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.5 50.0 203Met Target
High needs 53.3 50.0 443Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 54.9 50.0 323Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities-- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 59.3 50.0 543Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 79.2 57.1 -22.1 78.2 280Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 79.2 57.1 -22.1 78.2 280Declined
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.9 7.6 0.3 6.8 3552Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 5.0 23.8 -18.8 1.4 210Declined
High needs 12.6 12.0 0.6 10.2 1922Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.7 14.4 0.3 11.2 1252Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 7.0 14.3 -7.3 2.6 490Declined
Students w/ disabilities 8.3 15.5 -7.2 5.0 580Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 30--
Hispanic/Latino---- 47--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 36--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 8.5 6.1 2.4 7.2 2314Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 185 185100Yes 1 185 185100Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 99 99100Yes 1 99 99100Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 73 73100Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 24 24100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 34 34100Yes 1 34 34100Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 15---- 15---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 121 121100Yes 1 121 121100Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles