Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John H Duval

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - John H Duval

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Whitman-Hanson (07800000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
John H Duval (07800030)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
96% - Meeting targets70

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total121267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total7822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.04410.0
Weighted total9.910.3-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 96%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage96%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total81267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total1410.0
Weighted total6.910.3-
Percentage of possible points 67%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage67%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 82

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.9 506.4 7.5 500.4 2424Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 480.4 489.7 9.3 485.9 424Exceeded Target
High needs 492.8 499.0 6.2 494.6 884Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 496.1 503.6 7.5 497.4 674Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 478.4 484.3 5.9 480.2 274Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 499.3 507.0 7.7 501.0 2114Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.4 502.2 3.8 499.9 2424Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 477.9 485.1 7.2 480.9 424Exceeded Target
High needs 492.3 495.9 3.6 493.9 884Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.4 499.1 3.7 496.4 674Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 480.4 483.1 2.7 482.2 274Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 499.1 502.8 3.7 500.8 2114Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 73.1 78.7 5.6 75.8 894Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 72.4 68.2 -4.2 75.8 330Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.0 74.0 -3.0 80.8 260Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 72.4 79.2 6.8 75.2 784Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.1 50.0 1654Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 58.4 50.0 423Met Target
High needs 56.8 50.0 623Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.0 50.0 473Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 52.4 50.0 203Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.5 50.0 1444Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.5 50.0 1653Met Target
Lowest Performing 59.7 50.0 423Met Target
High needs 58.5 50.0 623Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.5 50.0 473Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 52.4 50.0 203Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.8 50.0 1443Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.4 7.1 0.3 6.1 3962Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 16.7 4.8 11.9 12.8 424Exceeded Target
High needs 11.5 11.5 0.0 9.2 1561No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.0 15.2 -5.2 6.9 990Declined
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities 14.3 8.5 5.8 10.5 474Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 32--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 6.8 6.0 0.8 5.1 3342Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 249 249100Yes 1 249 249100Yes 1 94 94100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 93 93100Yes 1 93 93100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 70 70100Yes 1 70 70100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 6---- 6---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 13----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 2---- 2---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 214 214100Yes 1 214 214100Yes 1 80 80100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles