Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wire Village School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Wire Village School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Spencer-E Brookfield (07670000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Wire Village School (07670040)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
61% - Partially meeting targets22

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-44-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement------
Achievement total2867.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total2.77.6-6.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 36%-86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement---
Achievement total2867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total2.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 33%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage33%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 27

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 495.9 493.8 -2.1 497.4 1730Declined
Lowest Performing 469.2 475.3 6.1 474.7 214Exceeded Target
High needs 491.0 489.4 -1.6 492.8 920Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.9 490.8 -3.1 495.2 700Declined
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 481.3 481.2 -0.1 483.1 431No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 495.9 493.2 -2.7 497.6 1500Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.6 492.7 0.1 494.1 1732Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 464.1 474.6 10.5 467.1 214Exceeded Target
High needs 486.6 487.0 0.4 488.2 922Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.8 489.5 -1.3 491.8 700Declined
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 476.5 476.2 -0.3 478.3 431No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 493.0 492.3 -0.7 494.7 1500Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 43.1 50.0 922Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.2 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 44.2 50.0 472Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.8 50.0 372Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 50.0 50.0 203Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.7 50.0 782Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.9 50.0 924Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 59.8 50.0 213Met Target
High needs 56.8 50.0 473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.3 50.0 373Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 57.8 50.0 203Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.1 50.0 784Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.8 15.6 -3.8 10.5 3660Declined
Lowest Performing 4.5 19.0 -14.5 0.6 210Declined
High needs 14.4 24.2 -9.8 12.1 2110Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.4 30.4 -12.0 15.3 1380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities 7.5 25.6 -18.1 3.7 860Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 47--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 11.7 13.2 -1.5 10.0 3040Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 183 183100Yes 1 185 18499Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 100 100100Yes 1 102 10199Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 76 76100Yes 1 77 7699Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 10---- 10---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 46 46100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 18---- 18---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 157 157100Yes 1 159 159100Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles