Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Elmer S Bagnall

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Elmer S Bagnall

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Pentucket (07450000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Elmer S Bagnall (07450005)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
70% - Partially meeting targets37

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-24-
Mathematics achievement14-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total81267.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-34-
Growth total4822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total6.710.3-5.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 65%-74%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage70%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total9.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage91%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 47

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 495.9 500.5 4.6 497.4 2824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 479.0 483.4 4.4 484.5 472Improved Below Target
High needs 483.7 492.1 8.4 485.5 874Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 486.7 496.8 10.1 488.0 304Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 480.5 488.6 8.1 482.3 674Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 495.9 500.5 4.6 497.6 2634Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.9 492.9 0.0 494.4 2821No Change
Lowest Performing 470.1 476.8 6.7 473.1 474Exceeded Target
High needs 479.5 485.5 6.0 481.1 874Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 482.7 489.2 6.5 483.7 304Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 475.6 483.0 7.4 477.4 674Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 493.0 493.1 0.1 494.7 2632Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.4 79.1 2.7 79.1 853Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 61.9 68.5 6.6 65.3 234Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 76.4 79.9 3.5 79.2 763Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.3 50.0 2062Below Target
Lowest Performing 46.3 50.0 442Below Target
High needs 48.7 50.0 572Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.0 50.0 243Met Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 45.5 50.0 402Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.4 50.0 1922Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.5 50.0 2112Below Target
Lowest Performing 50.8 50.0 473Met Target
High needs 48.3 50.0 582Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.4 50.0 252Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 50.4 50.0 413Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.8 50.0 1972Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.8 3.8 3.0 5.5 4224Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 12.5 6.4 6.1 8.6 474Exceeded Target
High needs 8.5 4.5 4.0 6.2 1334Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.2 3.5 12.7 13.1 574Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 0--
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 4.3 1.8 2.3 942Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 7.2 4.1 3.1 5.5 3914Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 288 288100Yes 1 288 288100Yes 1 87 87100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 91 91100Yes 1 91 91100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 34 34100Yes 1 34 34100Yes 1 12----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 68 68100Yes 1 68 68100Yes 1 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 268 268100Yes 1 268 268100Yes 1 77 77100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles