Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ayer Shirley Regional High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Ayer Shirley Regional High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Ayer Shirley School District (06160000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Ayer Shirley Regional High School (06160505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
45% - Partially meeting targets44

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-04-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement14-34-
Achievement total61247.531267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-14-
Growth total5822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate14----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion24----
Additional indicators total6810.04410.0
Weighted total6.410.7-3.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 60%-30%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage45%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total41247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total5.310.7-
Percentage of possible points 50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage50%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 64

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 98.0 -1.1 100.0 994Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.0 94.3 -3.7 100.0 220Declined
High needs 97.2 95.4 -1.8 99.3 381No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.1 94.8 -4.3 100.0 290Declined
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.7 98.0 -1.7 100.0 754Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.0 92.2 -1.8 95.9 991No Change
Lowest Performing 79.2 75.0 -4.2 83.4 220Declined
High needs 85.1 82.2 -2.9 87.3 380Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.7 82.8 -7.9 93.1 290Declined
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.4 92.0 -4.4 98.5 750Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.1 92.7 -0.4 94.9 861No Change
Lowest Performing 73.0 76.1 3.1 77.1 223Met Target
High needs 84.1 85.5 1.4 86.7 313Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.0 84.4 -2.6 89.3 240Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.7 93.8 -0.9 96.5 651No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.1 50.0 942Below Target
Lowest Performing 41.4 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 51.0 50.0 343Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.2 50.0 273Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.3 50.0 722Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.4 50.0 933Met Target
Lowest Performing 39.0 50.0 211Below Target
High needs 53.9 50.0 343Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.6 50.0 273Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.0 50.0 713Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.3 92.9 -0.4 95.3 851No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.9 87.5 -3.4 94.7 480Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.4 86.8 -4.6 95.2 380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 0--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.5 96.6 3.1 95.9 594Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 85.9 93.3 7.4 87.9 904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 78.6 90.9 12.3 81.7 444Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 78.4 91.4 13.0 81.6 354Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 85.5 93.5 8.0 87.5 624Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.2 1.2 1.0 2.0 4094Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 3.6 2.6 1.0 3.2 1564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.6 3.9 1.7 5.0 1034Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 81--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 32--
Hispanic/Latino---- 43--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 2.7 1.0 1.7 2.4 2984Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 19.6 14.8 4.8 17.7 4184Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 32.0 22.7 9.3 26.5 224Exceeded Target
High needs 33.7 24.8 8.9 31.1 1574Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 33.7 30.9 2.8 30.0 942Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities---- 62--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 30--
Hispanic/Latino---- 41--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 37--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 17.7 14.6 3.1 15.7 2954Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.3 56.3 3.0 59.4 1972Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 34.3 27.4 -6.9 42.3 620Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.2 39.5 -11.7 61.5 380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities---- 28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 59.5 58.7 -0.8 65.9 1431No Change

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 102 10199Yes 1 102 10199Yes 1 102 9997Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 40 40100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 40 3895Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 30 30100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 30 2997Yes 1
EL and Former EL 6---- 6---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 12---- 12---- 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 8---- 8---- 8----
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 10---- 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 76 7599Yes 1 76 7599Yes 1 76 7497Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles