Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Page Hilltop Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Page Hilltop Elementary School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Ayer Shirley School District (06160000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Page Hilltop Elementary School (06160002)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total51260.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.01410.0
Weighted total4.99.6-6.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 51%-91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage71%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total61267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total5.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 52%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 58

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.1 501.0 0.9 501.6 2492Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 478.0 486.7 8.7 482.7 384Exceeded Target
High needs 491.7 493.1 1.4 493.3 1163Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.1 496.7 3.6 494.5 694Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 27--
Students w/ disabilities 482.8 487.6 4.8 484.5 564Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 496.2 498.0 1.8 497.3 324Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 501.1 502.1 1.0 502.7 1882Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.1 493.3 -0.8 495.5 2490Declined
Lowest Performing 467.9 475.9 8.0 471.5 384Exceeded Target
High needs 483.9 484.2 0.3 485.6 1172Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 486.1 486.2 0.1 487.2 702Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 27--
Students w/ disabilities 474.0 478.7 4.7 476.1 574Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 484.6 485.3 0.7 486.2 322Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 496.0 494.7 -1.3 497.5 1890Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.4 82.6 1.2 83.8 863Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 72.7 72.0 -0.7 75.5 411No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 75.0 82.6 7.6 77.9 234Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 79.0 85.4 6.4 81.4 704Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.6 50.0 1623Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.2 50.0 373Met Target
High needs 55.3 50.0 703Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.4 50.0 443Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 56.7 50.0 393Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino 58.5 50.0 213Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.5 50.0 1253Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.2 50.0 1623Met Target
Lowest Performing 53.4 50.0 373Met Target
High needs 46.7 50.0 702Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.6 50.0 452Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 43.1 50.0 392Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino 51.7 50.0 213Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.6 50.0 1252Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.0 75.0 -1.0 62.8 283Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 28--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.3 4.6 1.7 5.2 4324Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 7.7 7.9 -0.2 4.1 381No Change
High needs 8.9 8.7 0.2 6.5 1962Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.7 12.5 -1.8 7.2 1040Declined
EL and Former EL---- 45--
Students w/ disabilities 12.7 11.7 1.0 9.4 772Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 22--
Hispanic/Latino 3.8 1.9 1.9 0.2 544Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 6.7 5.1 1.6 5.4 3163Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 258 25699Yes 1 259 25799Yes 1 89 89100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 121 11998Yes 1 122 12199Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 72 7097Yes 1 73 7299Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 10----
Students w/ disabilities 58 5798Yes 1 59 59100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 7---- 7---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 35 35100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 193 19199Yes 1 194 19399Yes 1 71 71100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles