Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lura A. White Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lura A. White Elementary School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Ayer Shirley School District (06160000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Lura A. White Elementary School (06160001)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total21267.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total2.610.3-5.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 25%-71%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage48%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total41267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total3.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 33%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage33%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 38

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.1 500.6 0.5 501.6 1782Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 480.9 484.5 3.6 485.6 262Improved Below Target
High needs 491.9 494.0 2.1 493.5 763Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.5 497.4 3.9 494.9 454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 487.1 486.2 -0.9 488.8 390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 493.0 501.6 8.6 494.1 204Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.0 500.4 -0.6 502.6 1460Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.7 496.4 -1.3 499.1 1770Declined
Lowest Performing 468.7 474.2 5.5 472.3 264Exceeded Target
High needs 489.0 488.6 -0.4 490.7 751No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 489.2 489.5 0.3 490.3 452Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 485.5 482.3 -3.2 487.6 380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 491.9 492.3 0.4 493.5 202Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.5 496.7 -1.8 500.0 1450Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.5 74.6 -5.9 82.9 630Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 72.2 63.5 -8.7 75.0 260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 82.1 73.6 -8.5 84.5 520Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 40.7 50.0 1122Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.8 50.0 262Below Target
High needs 39.4 50.0 521Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.6 50.0 302Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 34.0 50.0 271Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 38.5 50.0 891Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.6 50.0 1142Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.8 50.0 262Below Target
High needs 43.6 50.0 522Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.4 50.0 301Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 45.8 50.0 272Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.4 50.0 912Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.4 3.9 -1.5 1.3 3083Met Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 264Exceeded Target
High needs 4.4 7.3 -2.9 2.0 1240Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.1 8.7 -0.6 4.6 690Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 6.6 -3.5 0.0 610Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 6.3 -6.3 0.0 320Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 2.5 3.2 -0.7 1.2 2523Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 179 179100Yes 1 179 17899Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 77 77100Yes 1 77 7699Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 46 46100Yes 1 46 46100Yes 1 14----
EL and Former EL 5---- 5---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 39 39100Yes 1 39 3897Yes 1 14----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 147 147100Yes 1 147 14699Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles