Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Conservatory of the Arts

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Conservatory of the Arts

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Springfield (02810000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I School
SCHOOL Conservatory of the Arts (02810475)	GRADES SERVED 06,07,08,09,10,11,12
REGION West/Central	FEDERAL DESIGNATION Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI)

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support Among the lowest performing 10% of schools Low subgroup performance: High needs Low participation rate: EL and former EL

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
38% - Partially meeting targets	2

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	0	4	-	-	-	-	1	4	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics achievement	2	4	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-	-	-	-	1	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	3	12	67.5	-	-	-	6	12	47.5	-	-	-
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-	-	-	-	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics growth	1	4	-	-	-	-	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Growth total	2	8	22.5	-	-	-	4	8	22.5	-	-	-
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	4	4	10.0	-	-	-	6	8	10.0	-	-	-
Weighted total		2.9	10.3	-	-	-	-	4.4	9.1	-	-	-	-
Percentage of possible points		28%		-	-		-	48%		-	-		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		28% Weight of non-high school results:50%						48% Weight of high school results:50%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		38%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	0	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	2	4	-	2	4	-
	Achievement total	6	12	67.5	7	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	1	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	2	8	22.5	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	0	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	0	4	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	2	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	4	10.0	6	8	10.0
Weighted total		4.9	10.3	-	4.8	9.1	-
Percentage of possible points		48%		-	53%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		48% Weight of non-high school results:50%			53% Weight of high school results:50%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		51%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		4

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	481.9	478.7	-3.2	483.9	154	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
High needs	480.2	478.3	-1.9	482.2	131	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	480.5	478.4	-2.1	482.1	125	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	31	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	480.7	477.2	-3.5	482.4	100	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.0	89.6	-2.4	93.7	48	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	90.0	89.7	-0.3	92.2	46	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	89.4	90.1	0.7	91.2	43	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	88.6	91.2	2.6	90.6	34	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	5	-	-

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	476.8	478.0	1.2	478.6	154	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
High needs	475.4	478.0	2.6	477.3	131	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	476.0	478.1	2.1	477.4	125	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	31	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	475.0	477.5	2.5	476.6	100	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	64.4	70.2	5.8	66.6	47	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	66.0	70.0	4.0	68.4	45	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	67.6	69.0	1.4	70.1	42	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	64.1	71.2	7.1	67.3	33	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	5	-	-

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	39.6	39.3	-0.3	42.5	49	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	36.5	38.2	1.7	39.6	36	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	36.8	38.6	1.8	39.3	35	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	38.0	37.9	-0.1	41.1	33	1	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	5	-	-

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	53.7	51.2	-2.5	56.2	41	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	51.6	51.9	0.3	53.9	40	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	51.7	51.4	-0.3	54.6	37	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	46.3	50.0	3.7	50.3	28	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

English language arts growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	34.2	50.0	149	1	Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	20	-	-
High needs	35.2	50.0	128	1	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	34.6	50.0	122	1	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	34	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	31	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	32	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	35.9	50.0	99	1	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	16	-	-

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	40.3	50.0	39	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	40.7	50.0	38	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	41.1	50.0	35	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	45.3	50.0	27	2	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	5	-	-

Mathematics growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	36.7	50.0	148	1	Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	20	-	-
High needs	38.1	50.0	127	1	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	38.1	50.0	121	1	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	34	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	31	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	32	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	40.9	50.0	98	2	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	16	-	-

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	48.4	50.0	37	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	47.8	50.0	36	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	45.6	50.0	33	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	48.0	50.0	25	2	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	5	-	-

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.0	1.8	-1.8	1.0	163	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.0	2.3	-2.3	1.0	133	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	1.8	-1.8	1.0	114	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	33	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	37	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	2.0	-2.0	1.0	102	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	22	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	27.4	19.3	8.1	25.5	166	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
High needs	30.5	22.5	8.0	28.2	142	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	28.8	25.2	3.6	26.4	123	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	40	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	0	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	37	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	32.0	21.7	10.3	28.6	106	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	20	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	42.3	38.1	4.2	39.9	194	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	0	-	-
High needs	44.9	38.6	6.3	41.7	166	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	45.9	40.6	5.3	42.6	143	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	30	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	39	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	46	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	41.6	40.0	1.6	37.7	120	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	25	-	-

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	33.9	36.8	2.9	40.0	95	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	20.5	23.3	2.8	26.8	73	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	24.3	25.4	1.1	30.8	67	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	29	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	33.3	32.7	-0.6	40.8	52	1	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	13	-	-

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	214	211	99	Yes	1	214	209	98	Yes	1	102	100	98	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	189	186	98	Yes	1	189	184	97	Yes	1	87	85	98	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	180	177	98	Yes	1	180	175	97	Yes	1	83	81	98	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	50	48	96	Yes	1	50	47	96	Yes	2	20	18	92	No	2
Students w/ disabilities	48	48	100	Yes	1	48	48	100	Yes	1	22	22	100	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	0	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	44	44	100	Yes	1	44	44	100	Yes	1	19	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	143	141	99	Yes	1	143	139	97	Yes	1	71	69	97	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	3	-	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	23	23	100	Yes	1	23	23	100	Yes	1	10	-	-	-	-

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms