Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary M Lynch

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Mary M Lynch

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Springfield (02810000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Mary M Lynch (02810140)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
77% - Meeting targets17

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-44-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total61267.58890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24----
Mathematics growth34----
Growth total5822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total5.610.3-7.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 54%-100%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage77%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total71267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total6.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 58%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage58%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 39

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.2 492.8 0.6 494.2 1132Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 469.8 476.3 6.5 475.1 204Exceeded Target
High needs 492.2 492.5 0.3 494.2 1022Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.0 492.7 -0.3 494.6 991No Change
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 494.1 494.5 0.4 495.7 272Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 491.4 492.6 1.2 493.1 773Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 7--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 485.7 484.5 -1.2 487.5 1130Declined
Lowest Performing 459.3 467.2 7.9 462.6 204Exceeded Target
High needs 484.9 484.4 -0.5 486.8 1021No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 485.9 484.7 -1.2 487.3 990Declined
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 488.2 487.3 -0.9 490.0 270Declined
Hispanic/Latino 484.0 483.3 -0.7 485.6 770Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 7--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.9 73.3 10.4 65.8 304Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 60.8 72.2 11.4 63.9 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 62.1 75.0 12.9 64.6 264Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino 66.3 76.3 10.0 69.4 204Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 2--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.6 50.0 682Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 43.5 50.0 612Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.2 50.0 592Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 19--
Hispanic/Latino 48.2 50.0 442Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 4--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.9 50.0 683Met Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 49.9 50.0 612Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.8 50.0 592Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 19--
Hispanic/Latino 54.0 50.0 443Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 4--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 25.8 13.4 12.4 23.9 2164Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 33.3 20.0 13.3 28.6 204Exceeded Target
High needs 26.9 14.8 12.1 24.6 1964Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.7 15.2 12.5 25.3 1714Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 31--
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 25.0 11.6 13.4 21.1 434Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 27.4 13.7 13.7 24.0 1534Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 15--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 123 12299Yes 1 122 122100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 112 11199Yes 1 111 111100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 109 10899Yes 1 108 108100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 23 2296Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 8----
Students w/ disabilities 21 2095Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 5----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1 8----
Hispanic/Latino 86 8599Yes 1 85 85100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 7---- 7---- 2----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles