Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Arthur W Coolidge Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Arthur W Coolidge Middle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Reading (02460000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Arthur W Coolidge Middle (02460305)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
87% - Meeting targets91

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total81267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-44-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total8822.58822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total7.510.3-7.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 73%-100%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage87%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total8822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total1410.0
Weighted total10.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 97%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage97%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 79

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.3 515.5 5.2 512.0 4714Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 485.8 495.1 9.3 489.7 754Exceeded Target
High needs 491.7 497.4 5.7 493.3 1154Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.8 503.3 7.5 497.4 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 488.2 492.9 4.7 489.5 914Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 516.7 522.5 5.8 518.6 224Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 510.5 515.6 5.1 512.1 4184Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.2 510.4 0.2 511.4 4703Met Target
Lowest Performing 488.6 493.7 5.1 491.4 754Exceeded Target
High needs 490.4 494.7 4.3 491.8 1154Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.4 497.8 3.4 495.4 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 486.8 491.3 4.5 488.6 914Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 517.1 516.5 -0.6 519.5 224Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 510.6 510.6 0.0 511.9 4173Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 79.7 79.5 -0.2 81.9 1491No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 56.4 65.3 8.9 59.6 314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.8 79.5 -1.3 82.9 1341No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 67.3 50.0 4614Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 68.0 50.0 754Exceeded Target
High needs 60.3 50.0 1074Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 64.2 50.0 364Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 59.4 50.0 853Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 71.9 50.0 224Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 67.3 50.0 4104Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.2 50.0 4594Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 65.8 50.0 754Exceeded Target
High needs 61.4 50.0 1074Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 63.5 50.0 364Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 61.9 50.0 854Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 64.7 50.0 224Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 65.4 50.0 4084Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.3 3.1 1.2 3.3 4783Met Target
Lowest Performing 3.9 2.7 1.2 0.7 754Exceeded Target
High needs 8.3 8.5 -0.2 6.3 1171No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.5 15.6 2.9 14.3 322Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 9.0 9.9 -0.9 6.3 910Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 4.3 2.8 1.5 3.2 4234Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 475 473100Yes 1 474 472100Yes 1 150 14999Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 117 117100Yes 1 117 117100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 41 41100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1 15----
EL and Former EL 5---- 5---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 91 91100Yes 1 91 91100Yes 1 19----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 8----
Afr. Amer./Black 9---- 9---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 421 419100Yes 1 420 418100Yes 1 135 13499Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles