Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lincoln-Hancock Community School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lincoln-Hancock Community School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Quincy (02430000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Lincoln-Hancock Community School (02430035)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
42% - Partially meeting targets62

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement------
Achievement total3860.02867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-14-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total6820.03822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total3.77.2-2.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 51%-32%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage42%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total4.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 59%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 89

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.7 505.7 2.0 505.4 1663Met Target
Lowest Performing 486.2 487.8 1.6 490.1 202Improved Below Target
High needs 500.7 502.9 2.2 502.3 1204Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 499.4 500.9 1.5 501.0 793Met Target
EL and Former EL 506.0 503.5 -2.5 507.4 710Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 513.3 509.3 -4.0 515.2 503Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black 502.6 503.0 0.4 503.8 213Met Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.0 506.8 5.8 502.6 694Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.4 501.0 -1.4 503.6 1660Declined
Lowest Performing 485.1 483.9 -1.2 487.9 200Declined
High needs 500.6 498.6 -2.0 502.0 1200Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 498.6 495.6 -3.0 499.6 790Declined
EL and Former EL 505.9 502.8 -3.1 507.5 710Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 514.0 508.6 -5.4 516.4 503Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black 498.7 492.2 -6.5 500.7 210Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 500.2 501.4 1.2 501.5 693Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.3 50.0 843Met Target
Lowest Performing 38.9 50.0 201Below Target
High needs 52.1 50.0 623Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.0 50.0 452Below Target
EL and Former EL 51.4 50.0 313Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 54.8 50.0 213Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 14--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.6 50.0 383Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.7 50.0 843Met Target
Lowest Performing 44.2 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 50.4 50.0 623Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.3 50.0 452Below Target
EL and Former EL 54.9 50.0 313Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 56.4 50.0 213Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 14--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.7 50.0 383Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.3 72.6 0.3 70.2 1063Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 72.3 72.6 0.3 70.2 1063Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.8 8.5 2.3 9.8 4224Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 14.3 0.0 14.3 11.1 204Exceeded Target
High needs 12.3 9.2 3.1 10.3 3054Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.8 11.8 0.0 7.6 1781No Change
EL and Former EL 7.0 4.0 3.0 2.9 1733Met Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 35--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 5.5 6.6 -1.1 3.3 1370Declined
Afr. Amer./Black 3.8 9.6 -5.8 0.4 520Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 40--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 23--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 15.3 7.2 8.1 14.2 1674Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 185 18198Yes 1 187 18699Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 136 13297Yes 1 138 13799Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 90 8898Yes 1 91 9099Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 81 7795Yes 1 82 8199Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 56 5496Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 25 25100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 0----
Hispanic/Latino 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 6---- 6---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 75 7397Yes 1 75 7499Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles