Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Williams

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Williams

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Newton (02070000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Williams (02070125)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
78% - Meeting targets80

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total71267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.03410.0
Weighted total6.510.3-7.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 63%-93%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage78%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total6.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 83%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage83%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 87

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.1 508.1 4.0 505.6 1274Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 481.9 493.5 11.6 486.6 244Exceeded Target
High needs 493.2 499.4 6.2 494.8 544Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL 503.5 504.3 0.8 505.5 272Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 486.5 491.0 4.5 488.2 254Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 507.0 513.5 6.5 509.1 314Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.4 507.2 1.8 507.0 693Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.4 503.5 0.1 504.8 1272Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 475.7 483.1 7.4 479.3 244Exceeded Target
High needs 494.8 496.9 2.1 496.5 543Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL 508.0 505.0 -3.0 510.2 270Declined
Students w/ disabilities 486.3 486.2 -0.1 488.4 251No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 514.0 513.7 -0.3 516.5 314Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.6 501.9 -1.7 505.1 690Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.8 84.6 -2.2 89.2 521No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 23--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.5 90.2 1.7 90.9 284Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.3 50.0 873Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.8 50.0 243Met Target
High needs 54.3 50.0 323Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 6--
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 68.3 50.0 214Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.9 50.0 483Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.7 50.0 863Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.3 50.0 233Met Target
High needs 49.4 50.0 312Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 6--
EL and Former EL-- 14--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 56.7 50.0 203Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.4 50.0 483Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.8 2.7 1.1 2.7 2554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 8.3 4.2 4.1 4.7 243Met Target
High needs 5.6 2.1 3.5 3.2 944Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 494Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 13.5 2.4 11.1 10.2 414Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 1.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 744Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.5 3.7 -0.2 2.2 1343Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 137 13599Yes 1 137 13599Yes 1 54 54100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 60 5998Yes 1 60 5998Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 13---- 13---- 7----
EL and Former EL 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 12----
Students w/ disabilities 26 2596Yes 1 26 2596Yes 1 10----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 14----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 16---- 16---- 8----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 72 72100Yes 1 72 72100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles