Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Granite Valley Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2018 Official Accountability Report - Granite Valley Middle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Monson (01910000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Granite Valley Middle (01910310)
GRADES SERVED
05,06,07,08
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
37% - Partially meeting targets43

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-04-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total41267.52867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total5822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total3.810.3-2.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 37%-36%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage37%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total41267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total3.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 37%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage37%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 44

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.7 500.1 -0.6 502.2 2720Declined
Lowest Performing 481.9 480.5 -1.4 486.6 480Declined
High needs 491.3 490.6 -0.7 492.9 960Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.6 493.7 -1.9 497.0 660Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 482.5 484.2 1.7 484.2 503Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 500.6 500.1 -0.5 502.2 2461No Change

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.3 495.9 -2.4 499.7 2720Declined
Lowest Performing 477.3 478.9 1.6 480.9 482Improved Below Target
High needs 488.8 487.6 -1.2 490.5 960Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.1 491.6 0.5 492.2 662Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 481.2 481.0 -0.2 483.3 501No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 498.5 496.0 -2.5 500.0 2460Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.0 79.8 5.8 76.4 1574Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 65.2 71.0 5.8 68.0 564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 71.4 75.7 4.3 74.3 364Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 53.8 62.5 8.7 56.9 324Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 73.6 80.0 6.4 76.0 1454Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.4 50.0 2552Below Target
Lowest Performing 50.7 50.0 453Met Target
High needs 47.9 50.0 842Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.3 50.0 562Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 50.4 50.0 413Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 4--
White 47.7 50.0 2322Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.6 50.0 2563Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.7 50.0 463Met Target
High needs 52.3 50.0 853Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.3 50.0 573Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 53.0 50.0 423Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 4--
White 53.9 50.0 2333Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.8 8.8 -4.0 3.7 2840Declined
Lowest Performing 4.2 10.4 -6.2 0.6 480Declined
High needs 7.5 17.5 -10.0 5.1 1030Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.7 17.9 -9.2 5.2 670Declined
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 3.9 16.4 -12.5 0.6 550Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 5.1 9.1 -4.0 3.8 2540Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 282 27999Yes 1 282 27999Yes 1 163 16098Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 105 10398Yes 1 105 10398Yes 1 62 5995Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 74 7399Yes 1 74 7399Yes 1 41 3995Yes 1
EL and Former EL 7---- 7---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 55 5396Yes 1 55 5396Yes 1 36 3494No 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 4---- 4---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 10---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 4---- 4---- 2----
White 253 25099Yes 1 253 25099Yes 1 150 14798Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles