Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ludlow Senior High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Ludlow Senior High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Ludlow (01610000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Ludlow Senior High (01610505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
45% - Partially meeting targets53

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement34-14-
Achievement total81247.521267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth44-24-
Growth total8822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total71220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total0810.00410.0
Weighted total7.010.7-2.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 65%-24%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage45%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total21247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total3.310.7-
Percentage of possible points 31%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage31%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 42

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.5 97.8 -0.7 99.9 2004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.1 92.7 -1.4 95.9 481No Change
High needs 95.9 93.6 -2.3 97.9 591No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.5 96.8 -1.7 100.0 391No Change
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 92.6 87.5 -5.1 95.1 240Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.8 98.1 -0.7 100.0 1694Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.6 91.6 -1.0 94.3 1991No Change
Lowest Performing 76.0 70.4 -5.6 78.8 490Declined
High needs 81.0 76.3 -4.7 83.1 600Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.7 85.6 -0.1 88.8 401No Change
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 70.8 50.0 -20.8 73.8 250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.2 92.1 -3.1 96.8 1680Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 89.1 90.7 1.6 90.8 1983Met Target
Lowest Performing 72.1 71.9 -0.2 76.4 491No Change
High needs 78.7 78.1 -0.6 81.5 571No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.5 87.8 2.3 88.4 373Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 65.7 57.0 -8.7 68.7 250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.1 90.7 0.6 91.9 1693Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.6 50.0 1144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 56.0 50.0 233Met Target
High needs 67.1 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 67.6 50.0 224Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities-- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 68.8 50.0 954Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.1 50.0 1144Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 42.1 50.0 252Below Target
High needs 54.4 50.0 293Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.3 50.0 243Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 59.3 50.0 953Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.4 92.7 -1.7 96.7 2190Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 89.0 84.2 -4.8 93.1 950Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.0 81.1 -9.9 96.1 740Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 85.7 73.8 -11.9 92.2 420Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.4 95.0 0.6 96.5 1993Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.0 95.9 -0.1 97.7 1953Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.5 92.7 -0.8 97.5 820Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.5 94.0 1.5 96.8 672Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 89.7 85.7 -4.0 94.5 350Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.7 96.1 -0.6 98.5 1793Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.4 8914Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 3.7 2.2 1.5 3.3 2684Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.0 3.3 0.7 3.6 1813Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 5.8 0.0 5.8 5.2 1244Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 70--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.0 0.9 0.1 1.0 7793Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.9 12.5 -2.6 8.8 8940Declined
Lowest Performing 11.3 12.2 -0.9 4.7 490Declined
High needs 19.1 23.6 -4.5 16.7 2970Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.8 24.1 -2.3 17.2 1870Declined
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities 19.8 25.2 -5.4 16.7 1230Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino---- 81--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 9.3 11.9 -2.6 8.1 7670Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.7 44.5 -17.2 67.4 4220Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 33.7 22.2 -11.5 42.2 1260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 39.7 28.4 -11.3 50.1 880Declined
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 11.1 6.7 -4.4 18.4 600Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 40--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 63.8 45.6 -18.2 69.1 3660Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 202 201100Yes 1 201 200100Yes 1 202 202100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 61 6098Yes 1 61 61100Yes 1 61 61100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 40 3998Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 7---- 7---- 7----
Students w/ disabilities 26 2596Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 1---- 1---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 17---- 17---- 17----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 171 17099Yes 1 170 16999Yes 1 171 171100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles