Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Greenhalge

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Greenhalge

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lowell (01600000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Greenhalge (01600015)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Among the lowest performing 10% of schools
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
69% - Partially meeting targets10

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement14-44-
Science achievement------
Achievement total4860.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4820.04822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total0410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total3.57.2-6.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 49%-88%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage69%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement---
Achievement total5867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total4.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 61%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 26

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 490.0 492.4 2.4 492.0 1693Met Target
Lowest Performing 465.2 474.6 9.4 470.5 204Exceeded Target
High needs 487.9 491.3 3.4 489.9 1514Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.9 491.5 3.6 489.5 1294Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 485.2 486.8 1.6 486.8 713Met Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 495.5 500.9 5.4 497.6 304Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino 485.8 487.6 1.8 487.5 793Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 491.5 495.1 3.6 493.6 404Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 488.7 488.5 -0.2 490.5 1701No Change
Lowest Performing 463.0 471.0 8.0 466.3 204Exceeded Target
High needs 487.2 487.1 -0.1 489.1 1521No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.0 487.2 0.2 488.4 1302Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 487.3 484.1 -3.2 489.1 720Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 498.3 500.3 2.0 500.6 303Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino 483.1 482.9 -0.2 484.7 791No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 489.9 489.0 -0.9 492.2 400Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.2 50.0 752Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.0 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 45.6 50.0 682Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.3 50.0 572Below Target
EL and Former EL 48.6 50.0 282Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 44.4 50.0 312Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.3 50.0 203Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.1 50.0 782Below Target
Lowest Performing 49.9 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 43.8 50.0 712Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.5 50.0 602Below Target
EL and Former EL 45.9 50.0 302Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 36.6 50.0 341Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.7 50.0 203Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.1 55.6 -8.5 78.2 1080Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 64.1 55.6 -8.5 78.2 1080Declined
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 17.5 15.9 1.6 15.6 3773Met Target
Lowest Performing 20.0 10.0 10.0 15.3 204Exceeded Target
High needs 19.2 17.4 1.8 16.9 3343Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.3 19.5 2.8 19.9 2663Met Target
EL and Former EL 12.6 11.3 1.3 8.9 1502Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 1.8 2.2 -0.4 0.0 464Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 35--
Hispanic/Latino 23.3 19.1 4.2 19.9 1734Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 21.2 17.8 3.4 18.6 1074Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 187 18699Yes 1 187 187100Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 169 16899Yes 1 169 169100Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 143 14299Yes 1 143 143100Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 82 8199Yes 1 82 82100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 17---- 17---- 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 15---- 15---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 86 86100Yes 1 86 86100Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 8---- 8---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 47 47100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles