Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dr Gertrude Bailey

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Dr Gertrude Bailey

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lowell (01600000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Dr Gertrude Bailey (01600002)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
54% - Partially meeting targets57

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement------
Achievement total5860.04867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4820.05822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total4.27.2-3.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 58%-50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total5.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 74%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage74%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 83

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.7 504.5 6.8 499.2 1774Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 473.9 483.1 9.2 479.4 204Exceeded Target
High needs 492.4 501.3 8.9 494.2 1134Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.9 500.4 9.5 492.2 854Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 496.2 509.6 13.4 497.5 384Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 479.5 486.3 6.8 481.3 224Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 499.8 508.1 8.3 501.6 554Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 487.9 495.0 7.1 489.4 354Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.5 507.2 3.7 505.2 654Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.9 502.4 -0.5 504.4 1771No Change
Lowest Performing 485.0 484.3 -0.7 488.0 200Declined
High needs 498.6 499.8 1.2 500.2 1133Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 497.2 499.0 1.8 498.2 854Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 500.8 506.1 5.3 502.3 384Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 487.3 488.2 0.9 489.1 222Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 504.9 505.7 0.8 507.7 552Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 496.5 494.3 -2.2 498.1 350Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 506.6 505.0 -1.6 508.3 650Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.9 50.0 812Below Target
Lowest Performing 52.1 50.0 203Met Target
High needs 47.1 50.0 482Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.2 50.0 352Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 17--
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 48.8 50.0 282Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.7 50.0 272Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.3 50.0 812Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.0 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 45.6 50.0 482Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.1 50.0 352Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 17--
Students w/ disabilities-- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 45.2 50.0 282Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 44.2 50.0 272Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.7 74.4 27.7 78.2 864Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 46.7 74.4 27.7 78.2 864Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.1 5.7 -1.6 2.8 3860Declined
Lowest Performing 0.0 15.0 -15.0 0.0 200Declined
High needs 4.9 7.1 -2.2 2.6 2530Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.8 7.3 -1.5 2.7 1770Declined
EL and Former EL 0.0 6.8 -6.8 0.0 1030Declined
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 6.9 -0.6 2.5 580Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 1.6 2.4 -0.8 0.0 1274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino 4.9 12.0 -7.1 1.2 920Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.5 5.6 0.9 4.8 1242Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 192 192100Yes 1 193 193100Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 125 125100Yes 1 126 126100Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 95 95100Yes 1 96 96100Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 41 41100Yes 1 42 42100Yes 1 0----
Students w/ disabilities 27 27100Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 60 60100Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 40 40100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 14---- 14---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 67 67100Yes 1 67 67100Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles