Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Longmeadow High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Longmeadow High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Longmeadow (01590000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Longmeadow High (01590505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
84% - Meeting targets95

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-34-
Science achievement44-34-
Achievement total121247.5101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total121220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-34-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total6810.03410.0
Weighted total9.810.7-7.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 92%-75%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total91247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total101220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion34-
Additional indicators total3810.0
Weighted total7.510.7-
Percentage of possible points 70%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage70%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 92

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.7 99.9 0.2 100.0 2544Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 99.7 -0.3 100.0 734Exceeded Target
High needs 98.6 99.6 1.0 100.0 584Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 98.3 99.4 1.1 100.0 454Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 96.3 100.0 3.7 97.9 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 99.9 -0.1 100.0 2064Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 97.6 -0.2 99.3 2544Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.4 93.8 1.4 94.4 723Met Target
High needs 91.5 91.9 0.4 93.7 592Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 89.0 90.2 1.2 92.0 463Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 96.3 100.0 3.7 97.8 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.7 97.5 -0.2 99.3 2064Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.6 98.9 -0.7 100.0 2464Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.3 96.6 -1.7 100.0 733Met Target
High needs 98.6 95.4 -3.2 100.0 543Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 98.2 95.1 -3.1 100.0 413Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 27--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.7 99.1 -0.6 100.0 2004Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.4 50.0 2342Below Target
Lowest Performing 36.3 50.0 701Below Target
High needs 46.7 50.0 502Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 47.3 50.0 382Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 51.9 50.0 253Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.9 50.0 1922Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.3 50.0 2373Met Target
Lowest Performing 45.6 50.0 692Below Target
High needs 45.5 50.0 522Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 39.8 50.0 391Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 62.0 50.0 254Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 57.1 50.0 1943Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.8 99.1 0.3 100.0 2214Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 97.1 98.4 1.3 100.0 633Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 95.5 97.4 1.9 100.0 393Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.1 98.9 -0.2 100.0 1884Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.8 99.6 0.8 99.8 2514Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.7 98.5 1.8 99.5 683Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 97.4 97.7 0.3 100.0 443Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.5 99.6 1.1 99.6 2244Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.0 9464Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1944Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 52--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1494Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 824Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 23--
Hispanic/Latino---- 36--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.0 7844Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.6 6.4 -1.8 3.6 9583Met Target
Lowest Performing 3.4 8.2 -4.8 0.0 733Met Target
High needs 9.7 12.9 -3.2 7.0 2170Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 54--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 8.4 13.3 -4.9 4.5 1650Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 0.0 3.4 -3.4 0.0 884Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 27--
Hispanic/Latino---- 36--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 23--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.2 6.0 -1.8 2.9 7834Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.9 81.3 -0.6 85.1 4663Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 45.6 54.5 8.9 53.6 1013Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 28--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 39.4 49.4 10.0 46.9 774Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 93.8 89.5 -4.3 99.5 383Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 81.7 81.1 -0.6 84.7 3873Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 255 255100Yes 1 256 255100Yes 1 256 256100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 59 59100Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 46 46100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 27 27100Yes 1 28 2796Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 10---- 10----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 9----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 206 206100Yes 1 206 206100Yes 1 206 206100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles