Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leominster High School

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Leominster High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Leominster (01530000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I School
SCHOOL Leominster High School (01530505)	GRADES SERVED 09,10,11,12
REGION West/Central	FEDERAL DESIGNATION -

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
62% - Partially meeting targets	31

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	1	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	2	4	-	3	4	-
	Achievement total	7	12	40.0	11	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	0	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	20.0	2	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	2	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	3	4	10.0	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		4.7	10.0	-	7.9	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		47%		-	77%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		62%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	1	4	-
	Science achievement	2	4	-
	Achievement total	7	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	1	4	-
	Growth total	3	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-
	High school completion total	4	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	2	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	2	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0
Weighted total		5.2	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		49%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		49%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		36

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.8	97.6	1.8	97.5	236	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	96.6	99.3	2.7	99.3	34	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	90.7	94.5	3.8	92.9	104	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	92.8	95.1	2.3	94.6	82	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	88.0	88.8	0.8	91.0	29	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	82.8	91.3	8.5	85.8	26	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	99.0	93.8	-5.2	100.0	28	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	90.3	95.5	5.2	92.3	61	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.7	99.4	1.7	99.5	133	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	90.8	89.9	-0.9	93.0	237	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	82.4	87.5	5.1	84.9	34	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	82.5	80.2	-2.3	84.9	105	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	85.3	83.4	-1.9	87.8	83	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	78.0	75.0	-3.0	83.1	29	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	71.0	61.5	-9.5	74.8	26	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	85.4	86.6	1.2	90.3	28	2	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	82.0	81.0	-1.0	85.2	62	1	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	94.5	94.5	0.0	96.2	133	1	No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	94.7	95.6	0.9	97.2	132	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	85.5	87.5	2.0	88.5	34	3	Met Target
High needs	86.1	87.1	1.0	88.4	33	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	88.3	87.9	-0.4	91.2	31	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	89.9	95.8	5.9	93.9	24	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	96.7	96.3	-0.4	99.2	89	1	No Change

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	45.4	50.0	219	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	40.0	50.0	32	2	Below Target
High needs	45.5	50.0	92	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	43.8	50.0	74	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	51.9	50.0	20	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	48.0	50.0	24	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	46.7	50.0	23	2	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	50.4	50.0	54	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	43.1	50.0	129	2	Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	40.6	50.0	219	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	25.8	50.0	32	0	Below Target
High needs	39.5	50.0	94	1	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	41.2	50.0	76	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	38.7	50.0	20	1	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	34.3	50.0	25	1	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	37.7	50.0	23	1	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	39.2	50.0	55	1	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	41.7	50.0	128	2	Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	90.5	89.9	-0.6	94.3	296	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	85.5	84.3	-1.2	89.6	166	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	85.7	86.4	0.7	90.6	140	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	84.4	75.9	-8.5	93.3	54	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	95.5	93.3	-2.2	100.0	30	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	82.1	85.9	3.8	87.2	78	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	93.7	90.1	-3.6	97.5	172	0	Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.0	93.5	1.5	95.1	263	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	84.7	90.6	5.9	89.4	138	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	83.3	90.5	7.2	88.2	126	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	75.9	91.1	15.2	82.7	45	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	89.7	95.5	5.8	94.5	22	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	83.3	86.6	3.3	88.8	67	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.3	96.8	1.5	98.2	158	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.8	1.1	-0.3	1.0	1,086	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	1.4	2.8	-1.4	1.3	432	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.0	2.3	-1.3	1.0	298	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	4.2	8.2	-4.0	3.8	61	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	0.9	2.4	-1.5	1.0	166	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	36	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	99	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	1.7	2.8	-1.1	1.5	282	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.7	0.6	0.1	1.0	645	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	37.5	34.2	-3.3	23.1	73	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	37.5	34.2	-3.3	23.1	73	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	22.9	24.7	-1.8	20.5	1,115	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	23.6	26.5	-2.9	14.0	34	0	Declined
High needs	34.2	32.5	1.7	31.0	507	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	39.3	35.3	4.0	36.0	329	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	29.4	22.3	7.1	24.4	175	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	40.2	32.4	7.8	36.7	145	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	33	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	22.0	15.9	6.1	17.6	107	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	34.2	32.9	1.3	30.3	319	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18.5	22.4	-3.9	15.3	630	0	Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	44.3	58.1	13.8	50.4	609	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	22.1	26.8	4.7	28.4	246	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	28.8	30.9	2.1	35.3	175	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	16.4	21.3	4.9	20.6	75	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	7.2	11.1	3.9	13.2	90	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	45.9	53.2	7.3	55.1	62	2	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	23.6	34.0	10.4	31.1	153	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	51.6	67.5	15.9	58.3	363	4	Exceeded Target

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	267	266	100	Yes	1	267	267	100	Yes	1	267	266	100	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	133	132	99	Yes	1	133	133	100	Yes	1	133	132	99	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	102	101	99	Yes	1	101	101	100	Yes	1	102	101	99	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	50	50	100	Yes	1	50	50	100	Yes	1	50	50	100	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	31	31	100	Yes	1	30	30	100	Yes	1	31	30	97	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Asian	7	-	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	33	33	100	Yes	1	33	33	100	Yes	1	33	33	100	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	82	81	99	Yes	1	82	82	100	Yes	1	82	82	100	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	137	137	100	Yes	1	137	137	100	Yes	1	137	136	99	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms