Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leicester Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Leicester Middle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Leicester (01510000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Leicester Middle (01510015)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-
Mathematics achievement44-34-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total71267.55867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.00410.0
Weighted total6.310.3-4.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 61%-62%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage62%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total41267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total3.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 37%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage37%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 17

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.7 493.0 0.3 494.7 4032Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 469.6 470.8 1.2 474.9 672Improved Below Target
High needs 484.6 483.8 -0.8 486.6 1520Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.4 484.5 -2.9 489.0 1010Declined
EL and Former EL 484.7 484.6 -0.1 486.3 241No Change
Students w/ disabilities 474.6 475.5 0.9 476.4 642Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino 489.4 490.5 1.1 491.1 352Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 493.3 493.4 0.1 495.4 3242Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 491.8 494.5 2.7 493.6 4034Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 471.1 474.3 3.2 474.4 673Met Target
High needs 483.7 487.2 3.5 485.6 1524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 485.5 487.4 1.9 486.9 1013Met Target
EL and Former EL 485.2 486.0 0.8 487.0 242Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 473.2 480.3 7.1 475.3 644Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino 490.1 489.7 -0.4 491.7 351No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 492.0 495.0 3.0 494.3 3244Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.9 67.6 -2.3 72.8 1591No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 57.8 50.4 -7.4 60.9 560Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 63.6 55.9 -7.7 66.1 380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 71.1 67.4 -3.7 74.3 1320Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.9 50.0 3943Met Target
Lowest Performing 52.0 50.0 663Met Target
High needs 45.2 50.0 1452Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.2 50.0 972Below Target
EL and Former EL 51.4 50.0 243Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 46.5 50.0 602Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 16--
Hispanic/Latino 49.8 50.0 342Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.2 50.0 3173Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.8 50.0 3953Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.7 50.0 673Met Target
High needs 52.6 50.0 1463Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 54.0 50.0 983Met Target
EL and Former EL 38.0 50.0 241Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 53.6 50.0 603Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 16--
Hispanic/Latino 47.0 50.0 342Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.7 50.0 3183Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.3 7.6 0.7 6.4 4202Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 10.3 11.9 -1.6 5.6 670Declined
High needs 13.6 14.4 -0.8 11.3 1530Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.2 16.8 1.4 15.8 952Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 9.1 4.0 5.1 5.4 254Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 8.9 15.6 -6.7 4.6 640Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino 12.2 7.9 4.3 8.8 384Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 8.2 8.0 0.2 5.6 3382Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 410 40799Yes 1 411 411100Yes 1 162 162100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 157 15498Yes 1 158 158100Yes 1 58 58100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 105 10499Yes 1 106 106100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 25 2293No 2 25 25100Yes 1 4----
Students w/ disabilities 64 6398Yes 1 64 64100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 12---- 12---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 17---- 17---- 8----
Hispanic/Latino 37 3595Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1 13----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 15---- 15---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 329 329100Yes 1 330 330100Yes 1 134 134100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles