Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Winthrop

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Winthrop

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Ipswich (01440000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Winthrop (01440015)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.03410.0
Weighted total9.210.3-7.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 89%-93%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage91%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement---
Achievement total5867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total4.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 64%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage64%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 76

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.2 511.6 7.4 505.7 1824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 487.3 495.6 8.3 492.0 304Exceeded Target
High needs 494.4 496.0 1.6 496.0 603Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.3 493.2 -2.1 496.7 340Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 487.9 492.8 4.9 489.6 394Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.0 512.4 7.4 506.6 1544Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.1 506.3 2.2 505.5 1824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 484.1 490.4 6.3 487.7 304Exceeded Target
High needs 494.8 495.9 1.1 496.5 602Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.2 494.2 -1.0 496.3 340Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 489.8 492.7 2.9 491.9 394Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.8 507.2 2.4 506.3 1544Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.4 89.0 2.6 88.8 663Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.9 90.6 2.7 90.3 614Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.7 50.0 1243Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.1 50.0 293Met Target
High needs 43.2 50.0 412Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.7 50.0 221Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 43.9 50.0 272Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.3 50.0 1083Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.8 50.0 1253Met Target
Lowest Performing 59.8 50.0 303Met Target
High needs 57.2 50.0 413Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.0 50.0 223Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 57.9 50.0 273Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.2 50.0 1093Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.1 2.0 2.1 3.0 3014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 6.7 3.3 3.4 3.1 303Met Target
High needs 7.3 2.6 4.7 4.9 1144Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.3 5.0 6.3 7.8 604Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 6.9 1.4 5.5 3.6 724Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.0 1.6 2.4 2.7 2504Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 183 183100Yes 1 183 183100Yes 1 66 66100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 61 61100Yes 1 61 61100Yes 1 19----
Econ. Disadvantaged 35 35100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1 7----
EL and Former EL 11---- 11---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 39 39100Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1 13----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 10---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 154 154100Yes 1 154 154100Yes 1 61 61100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles