PARENT FEEDBACK OPPORTUNITY! DESE is redesigning the Schools Near Me search engine to make information more accessible and easier to use. Please take our 5 min Survey to let us know what features would be most useful to you as a parent. Thank you.

Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Paul F Doyon Memorial

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Paul F Doyon Memorial

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Ipswich (01440000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Paul F Doyon Memorial (01440007)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
90% - Meeting targets82

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total9.210.3-6.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 89%-91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage90%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total6.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 83%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage83%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 55

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.6 504.5 3.9 502.1 1884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 473.9 479.5 5.6 478.6 334Exceeded Target
High needs 484.3 486.7 2.4 485.9 574Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 479.4 479.5 0.1 481.1 382Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 500.4 504.9 4.5 502.0 1714Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.7 505.2 2.5 504.1 1884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 479.9 484.7 4.8 483.5 334Exceeded Target
High needs 488.1 490.1 2.0 489.8 573Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 482.8 484.1 1.3 484.9 382Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.0 505.4 2.4 504.5 1714Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.2 88.1 1.9 88.6 633Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 20--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 4--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.5 88.4 0.9 89.9 563Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.3 50.0 1233Met Target
Lowest Performing 43.5 50.0 332Below Target
High needs 44.4 50.0 382Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 42.1 50.0 272Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.7 50.0 1123Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.6 50.0 1233Met Target
Lowest Performing 52.6 50.0 333Met Target
High needs 54.0 50.0 383Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 10--
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 56.0 50.0 273Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.6 50.0 1123Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.5 2.5 3.0 4.4 3174Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 2.9 0.0 2.9 0.0 334Exceeded Target
High needs 8.9 4.9 4.0 6.5 1034Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 4.6 1.9 3.2 652Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.2 2.1 3.1 3.9 2894Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 193 19199Yes 1 193 19199Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 60 5998Yes 1 60 5998Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 18---- 18---- 4----
EL and Former EL 8---- 8---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 39 3897Yes 1 39 3897Yes 1 13----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 6---- 6---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 7---- 7---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 176 17499Yes 1 176 17499Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles