Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Potter Road

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Potter Road

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Framingham (01000000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Potter Road (01000039)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total101260.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total7.99.6-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 82%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage89%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total9.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 94%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage94%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 61

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 493.6 499.3 5.7 495.1 2504Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 467.4 479.8 12.4 472.9 404Exceeded Target
High needs 483.5 492.4 8.9 485.3 1474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 485.6 491.3 5.7 486.9 764Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 482.7 490.8 8.1 484.0 1054Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 477.2 488.2 11.0 479.0 464Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 492.9 498.1 5.2 494.6 1974Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.3 495.6 1.3 495.8 2513Met Target
Lowest Performing 464.0 471.7 7.7 467.0 404Exceeded Target
High needs 482.4 487.5 5.1 484.0 1484Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 482.7 487.2 4.5 483.7 774Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 483.9 485.9 2.0 485.4 1063Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 478.3 481.3 3.0 480.1 464Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 494.9 496.1 1.2 496.6 1973Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 75.9 78.0 2.1 78.6 833Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 60.9 66.3 5.4 64.3 494Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 68.2 63.4 -4.8 72.0 280Declined
EL and Former EL 66.7 65.9 -0.8 69.6 331No Change
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.7 80.6 4.9 78.5 634Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.1 50.0 1623Met Target
Lowest Performing 56.4 50.0 393Met Target
High needs 56.7 50.0 953Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 54.7 50.0 513Met Target
EL and Former EL 59.9 50.0 653Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 56.3 50.0 333Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.1 50.0 1263Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.3 50.0 1623Met Target
Lowest Performing 50.4 50.0 403Met Target
High needs 55.2 50.0 953Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.0 50.0 523Met Target
EL and Former EL 54.3 50.0 663Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 51.0 50.0 333Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 8--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 57.6 50.0 1253Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.0 71.8 14.8 70.2 1034Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 57.0 71.8 14.8 70.2 1034Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.2 4.0 1.2 3.9 4513Met Target
Lowest Performing 4.7 2.5 2.2 0.8 404Exceeded Target
High needs 5.7 4.9 0.8 3.4 2462Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.0 6.8 2.2 5.9 882Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 4.8 6.1 -1.3 2.1 1800Declined
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 5.8 -3.2 0.0 690Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 26--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 33--
Hispanic/Latino---- 34--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.9 4.5 0.4 3.2 3362Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 265 26198Yes 1 266 26499Yes 1 85 8499Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 159 15698Yes 1 160 15999Yes 1 51 5098Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 81 7896Yes 1 82 8199Yes 1 29 2897Yes 1
EL and Former EL 117 11497Yes 1 118 11799Yes 1 35 3497Yes 1
Students w/ disabilities 48 4798Yes 1 48 4798Yes 1 17----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 13---- 13---- 6----
Afr. Amer./Black 17---- 17---- 6----
Hispanic/Latino 20 1995Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 204 20299Yes 1 205 20399Yes 1 65 6498Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles