Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leroy Wood

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Leroy Wood

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Fairhaven (00940000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Leroy Wood (00940030)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
82% - Meeting targets67

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-44-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total81267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-44-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total7822.58822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total1410.00410.0
Weighted total7.110.3-7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 69%-95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage82%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total71267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total6.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 59%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 87

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.8 505.5 0.7 506.3 2582Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 484.0 495.0 11.0 488.7 414Exceeded Target
High needs 501.4 500.5 -0.9 503.0 1240Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 503.0 501.3 -1.7 504.4 960Declined
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 489.8 492.4 2.6 491.5 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.8 505.5 0.7 506.4 2232Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.8 500.6 0.8 501.2 2592Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 475.5 486.7 11.2 479.1 414Exceeded Target
High needs 494.1 495.5 1.4 495.8 1243Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.5 496.3 1.8 495.6 964Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 482.5 486.4 3.9 484.6 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 499.9 501.0 1.1 501.4 2243Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.7 79.8 5.1 77.1 844Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 65.3 75.0 9.7 68.1 374Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 69.6 79.3 9.7 72.5 294Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 76.3 81.3 5.0 78.7 804Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.8 50.0 1673Met Target
Lowest Performing 62.2 50.0 404Exceeded Target
High needs 48.7 50.0 712Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.4 50.0 562Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 54.7 50.0 203Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.9 50.0 1463Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.7 50.0 1674Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 69.0 50.0 404Exceeded Target
High needs 60.2 50.0 714Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.2 50.0 563Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 56.6 50.0 203Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.8 50.0 1464Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.0 5.2 -0.2 3.9 4251No Change
Lowest Performing 2.4 9.8 -7.4 0.0 410Declined
High needs 6.6 8.1 -1.5 4.2 1980Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.0 10.3 -1.3 5.5 1360Declined
EL and Former EL---- 19--
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 11.3 -8.0 0.0 620Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.4 5.0 0.4 4.1 3612Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 262 261100Yes 1 262 262100Yes 1 85 85100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 127 127100Yes 1 127 127100Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 99 99100Yes 1 99 99100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1 11----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 5---- 5---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 226 225100Yes 1 226 226100Yes 1 81 81100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles