Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Brookside Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Brookside Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Dracut (00790000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Brookside Elementary (00790035)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
80% - Meeting targets64

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-34-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total101267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total8.110.3-6.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 79%-80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage80%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total91267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total7.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 72%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage72%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 76

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.4 504.8 6.4 499.9 2254Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 477.8 488.2 10.4 482.5 354Exceeded Target
High needs 491.2 497.5 6.3 492.8 1114Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.1 501.0 6.9 495.5 694Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities 483.2 489.0 5.8 484.9 554Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black 497.8 508.8 11.0 499.4 234Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.2 504.5 6.3 499.8 1644Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.5 502.3 0.8 502.9 2262Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 479.0 482.4 3.4 482.6 363Met Target
High needs 493.4 494.8 1.4 495.1 1123Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.8 496.6 1.8 495.9 704Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities 487.2 487.9 0.7 489.3 562Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black 498.6 502.7 4.1 500.1 234Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.8 503.1 1.3 503.3 1653Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.7 78.5 3.8 77.1 864Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 68.5 68.9 0.4 71.3 372Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 73.8 76.1 2.3 76.7 233Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.9 80.0 4.1 78.3 604Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.8 50.0 1553Met Target
Lowest Performing 53.9 50.0 333Met Target
High needs 55.7 50.0 713Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.3 50.0 433Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 52.3 50.0 383Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 16--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.2 50.0 1133Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.7 50.0 1563Met Target
Lowest Performing 52.3 50.0 343Met Target
High needs 56.0 50.0 723Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.4 50.0 443Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 49.0 50.0 392Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 16--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.7 50.0 1143Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.6 10.4 -0.8 8.5 3950Declined
Lowest Performing 11.1 25.0 -13.9 7.5 360Declined
High needs 15.1 16.8 -1.7 12.7 1850Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.4 19.8 -1.4 14.9 1010Declined
EL and Former EL---- 25--
Students w/ disabilities 13.8 18.2 -4.4 10.5 880Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 27--
Afr. Amer./Black 10.0 7.1 2.9 6.2 422Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 41--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 9.4 11.7 -2.3 8.1 2820Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 234 233100Yes 1 234 234100Yes 1 89 89100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 117 11699Yes 1 117 117100Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 73 7299Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 17---- 17---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 57 5698Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 14---- 14---- 6----
Afr. Amer./Black 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1 10----
Hispanic/Latino 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 12----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 167 16699Yes 1 167 167100Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles