Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Chickering

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Chickering

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Dover (00780000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Chickering (00780005)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
School of Recognition: High Achievement - High Growth - Exceeding Targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
98% - Meeting targets99

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total121267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-44-
Mathematics growth44-44-
Growth total8822.58822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.01410.0
Weighted total10.210.3-7.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 99%-96%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage98%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total8822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total9.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage91%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 98

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.2 517.3 7.1 511.9 2504Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 485.2 495.9 10.7 489.1 394Exceeded Target
High needs 495.2 505.5 10.3 496.8 564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 492.6 503.6 11.0 493.9 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 519.7 524.8 5.1 521.6 384Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 509.5 516.6 7.1 511.1 1804Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 514.0 516.9 2.9 515.2 2514Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 491.2 497.6 6.4 494.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 500.2 504.1 3.9 501.6 564Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 497.7 501.5 3.8 499.5 434Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 530.4 530.2 -0.2 532.8 384Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 512.2 515.9 3.7 513.5 1814Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.2 91.9 3.7 90.4 904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 78.4 79.0 0.6 81.6 253Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 2--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.3 92.3 5.0 89.4 714Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.9 50.0 1704Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 63.6 50.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 67.1 50.0 394Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 69.4 50.0 304Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 70.0 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 9--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 69.7 50.0 1244Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.4 50.0 1704Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 64.0 50.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs 64.7 50.0 394Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 67.8 50.0 304Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 74.3 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 9--
Hispanic/Latino-- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 67.2 50.0 1244Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.1 3.1 0.0 2.1 4133Met Target
Lowest Performing 4.9 5.1 -0.2 1.7 391No Change
High needs 7.8 7.5 0.3 5.8 932Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 22--
Students w/ disabilities 5.3 6.3 -1.0 2.6 640Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 3.8 1.5 2.3 1.6 654Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 3.2 4.0 -0.8 2.1 2983Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 258 25699Yes 1 258 257100Yes 1 93 93100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 58 5798Yes 1 58 5798Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 6---- 6---- 2----
EL and Former EL 12---- 12---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 41 4098Yes 1 41 4098Yes 1 12----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 185 18499Yes 1 185 185100Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles