Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Deer Hill

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Deer Hill

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Cohasset (00650000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Deer Hill (00650005)
GRADES SERVED
03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-24-
Science achievement24----
Achievement total81267.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total7822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-14-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.01410.0
Weighted total7.410.3-5.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 72%-72%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage72%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total9.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 92%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage92%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 66

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 509.1 512.8 3.7 510.8 3844Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 487.3 496.8 9.5 491.2 654Exceeded Target
High needs 491.8 497.3 5.5 493.4 744Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 498.0 505.5 7.5 499.6 254Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 487.8 492.8 5.0 489.1 574Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.2 513.0 3.8 510.8 3564Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.9 505.3 0.4 506.1 3872Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 484.9 486.7 1.8 487.7 662Improved Below Target
High needs 488.5 491.1 2.6 489.9 754Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.7 495.5 4.8 491.7 264Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 486.9 489.6 2.7 488.7 574Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.3 505.3 0.0 506.6 3591No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.8 83.3 0.5 85.0 1212Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 54.5 62.5 8.0 57.7 244Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.9 83.3 -0.6 86.0 1151No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.9 50.0 2524Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 58.1 50.0 653Met Target
High needs 52.7 50.0 563Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 49.2 50.0 452Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 61.1 50.0 2414Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.6 50.0 2543Met Target
Lowest Performing 50.0 50.0 663Met Target
High needs 49.4 50.0 572Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 49.5 50.0 452Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.0 50.0 2433Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.6 2.8 0.8 2.6 3924Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 9.0 9.1 -0.1 5.8 661No Change
High needs 4.1 3.8 0.3 2.1 783Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 3.5 0.1 0.9 573Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.9 3.0 0.9 2.8 3633Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 388 38699Yes 1 390 390100Yes 1 121 121100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 76 7599Yes 1 76 76100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 26 2596Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1 9----
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 57 57100Yes 1 57 57100Yes 1 19----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 11---- 11---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 2---- 2---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 8---- 8---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 360 35899Yes 1 362 362100Yes 1 115 115100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles